Which ATG doesn't have any controversial decision win(s)?

[Scott9945]

Some will say Strum. Others will say Quartey although I believe Oscar clearly won when he nearly stopped the bur-head in the 12th round.

There are also many who thought Whitaker beat him too. I had Oscar by a point, but the thread title says "controversial" and that qualifies.

[rightsideup]

There are also many who thought Whitaker beat him too. I had Oscar by a point, but the thread title says "controversial" and that qualifies.

pernell found himself on the wrong side of few questionable node's

[Anthony342]

Yeah apparently Jones' last fight, which he won by SD, some thought Pawel Glazewski should've got that decision.

[C-ORTIZ]

There are also many who thought Whitaker beat him too. I had Oscar by a point, but the thread title says "controversial" and that qualifies.

Maybe it qualifies, but I wasn't impressed with Whitaker's shuck and jive jungle boogie moves. I know a lot of people are impressed by that crap, but I'm not one of them. I never liked Whitaker because he always acted like a clown. If I was a judge I wouldn't reward a fighter for that. The judges in the Whitaker-Chavez fight had it right as they did for Oscar-Whitaker due to the clowning.


I must assume you are easily impressed if you had by only a point.

[Scott9945]

Maybe it qualifies, but I wasn't impressed with Whitaker's shuck and jive jungle boogie moves. I know a lot of people are impressed by that crap, but I'm not one of them. I never liked Whitaker because he always acted like a clown. If I was a judge I wouldn't reward a fighter for that. The judges in the Whitaker-Chavez fight had it right as they did for Oscar-Whitaker due to the clowning.


I must assume you are easily impressed if you had by only a point.

You can assume that I wasn't very impressed when you claimed that Whitaker-Chavez was the right decision. Gives you no credibility with me.

[Cardinal Buck]

I have to apologise for this, I can't even remember posting that and I'm not sure what I even meant by that post.

To clarify what I really think, the only one of the three I thought got a 'gift' was Floyd. I thought Floyd's win over Castillo first time round was very controversial. I had Calzaghe beating Hopkins and Jones beating Tarver the first time, though (assuming that's the fight I was talking about in my original post).

Forgiven. My feeling with Floyd-Castillo is that Floyd won the first half of the by a very large margin, taking a lot of steam off the argument that Castillo could've gotten the decision fairly. I think Floyd was the rightful winner.

[C-ORTIZ]

You can assume that I wasn't very impressed when you claimed that Whitaker-Chavez was the right decision. Gives you no credibility with me.

I suppose it's a matter of taste. Chavez came to fight. Whitaker looked like he was prepping to run and chuck spears. To each his own. As I said before, you must be easily impressed.

[mickey malone]

I suppose it's a matter of taste. Chavez came to fight. Whitaker looked like he was prepping to run and chuck spears. To each his own. As I said before, you must be easily impressed.

Johnny Rebel's back in town.

[Bolo Punch]

Forgiven. My feeling with Floyd-Castillo is that Floyd won the first half of the by a very large margin, taking a lot of steam off the argument that Castillo could've gotten the decision fairly. I think Floyd was the rightful winner.

Yeah, it was quite a close fight, hence why I used the word gift in inverted commas. I don't think anyone had the fight to Castillo or Mayweather by a huge margin, so it doesn't really fit into the theme of this thread.

[Suckmedry]

That was a terrible decision. Sturm was robbed.

Most definitely. Terrible corruption and bias.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_DY3VSDpJo

From the first round Sturm started tagging and outboxing DLH