Which ATG doesn't have any controversial decision win(s)?

[SBleeder]

Ricardo Lopez. The second Alvarez fight was tough, but clear.

[Anthony342]

So Tyson, Harold Johnson, and Ricardo Lopez it is.

[SBleeder]

So Tyson, Harold Johnson, and Ricardo Lopez it is.

+ Gilberto Roman + Nicolino Locche, and several others mentioned in this thread.

[Scott9945]

An article in Ring Magazine suggested the decision was questionable after the fight.

I thought Tyson won though but not by a lot.

Almost all of the unofficial scores for that fight were 6-4 or 7-3 for Tyson. I can't see how Tillis did enough to deserve the decision.

[IronDanHamza]

+ Gilberto Roman + Nicolino Locche, and several others mentioned in this thread.

Ortiz-Locche was a controversial decision.

[SBleeder]

Ortiz-Locche was a controversial decision.

But it wasn't a controversial WIN for anyone, so it fits the thread's description.

[IronDanHamza]

But it wasn't a controversial WIN for anyone, so it fits the thread's description.

Ortiz not winning was considered a robbery so Locche doesn't fight the threads description.

[young_robbed]

So Tyson, Harold Johnson, and Ricardo Lopez it is.

I think Lopez's first fight with Alvarez could've been scored for Alvarez.

[THE REED]

Floyd and Calzaghe are borderline. I personally don't consider Castillo I or Hopkins controversial. I haven't seen the Robin Reid fight though.

Roy Jones never got a controversial decision.

Lewis has no controversial decision wins in my opinion. I thought he beat Mercer.

Tyson.

Liston?

Hopkins?

They definitely exist.

Tarver I was controversial to some.