Besides Hearns, Leonard and maybe Duran

[IronDanHamza]

No he wasn't, he just got by little John Brown by a close UD before the Floyd fight. He was seen as a very good up and comer, but not nearly a "monster".

Yeah.

He was considered amongst the Top 3 Super Featherweights at the time. According to the HBO commentary team, atleast.

[young_robbed]

I just want to know why he doesn't get same criticisms that other guys get? I have Hagler Floyd Wlad Lopez and B-Hop(middleweight only, he beat great comp at light heavy) ranked very high but it can't be because they beat guys in weak eras of there respective divisions its because of there talent. You can't knock the others for fighting in weak eras but then not do the same for Hagler.

No wonder you have such a bad rep
Hagler has an excellent resume so I don't get your argument... Look at who he beat. You must be really critical if you can't rate Hagler based on resume.. Those other guys didn't beat the same caliber of guys that Hagler did. They all have similar domination but Hagler takes it because of the wins he achieved.