Sometimes I Wonder Why Did Roy Ever Waste His Time Fighting Fighters Like.....

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mugwump
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 1653
    • 138
    • 23
    • 10,027

    #121
    To be fair, tho. Arguably better fighters than Roy were notorious for taking their own sweet time between defences. Marvin Hagler could hardly be described as prolific. And didn't Marciano take an eternity to put together his stretch of title defences?

    Comment

    • StarshipTrooper
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 17917
      • 1,180
      • 1,344
      • 26,849

      #122
      Originally posted by Mugwump
      To be fair, tho. Arguably better fighters than Roy were notorious for taking their own sweet time between defences. Marvin Hagler could hardly be described as prolific. And didn't Marciano take an eternity to put together his stretch of title defences?
      Marciano gets criticized all the time for his resume and rightly so.

      Poet

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #123
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza
        I don't think Toney would ever beat Roy now, Roy's too much for anyone at 168 IMO.

        But back then, I just thought Toney was on another level to Roy.

        To be honest I didn't think much of him at that time, the Toney fight made me a fan.

        Toney is still a great fighter but he could have been much more. Guy was eating at fast foos joints during training camps in his prime
        Yeah man, forreal. I guess in hindsight we should've known Roy was the goods (given his amateur background) but who the hell had he fought at that point anyway. And he was always dancing and **** . Dude was like Hamed before the Barrera fight. That fight was an eye opener.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #124
          Originally posted by JAB5239
          Bring it on. Nunn? Collins? DM? Who do you want to talk about next?
          You brought them up, my friend. Care to list a reason for those three names? It appears their really wasn't one for Calzaghe, for instance. Let's throw some substance behind this.

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #125
            Originally posted by Toney616
            Highly unlikely
            I think cutting muscle at that advanced stage of his career hurt him immensely. The beating he took in the first Tarver bout sealed it.

            Originally posted by Toney616
            McClellan had been calling him out since 92. He wanted to make the fight after he beat Jackson in their rematch
            Of course he did. A Jones-McClellan fight in 1992 would've been much, much too early. They knew each other pretty well from Kronk and the amateurs, had incredible gym wars against each other and were young, undefeated hard-hitting Americans. So while McClellan may have been calling him out then, it doesn't mean the fight was there to be made then. Jones was calling out Toney at 160 when James was still the champ there. The fight eventually came off at the perfect time. Jones versus the winner of McClellan-Benn was the obvious bout at the time and it looked like a safe bet one round in. But **** happens.

            Comment

            • JAB5239
              Dallas Cowboys
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 27706
              • 5,034
              • 4,436
              • 73,018

              #126
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              You brought them up, my friend. Care to list a reason for those three names? It appears their really wasn't one for Calzaghe, for instance. Let's throw some substance behind this.

              Reason being they were at or around Jones weight and were better fighters than many who Roy was fighting. Nunn was a fight Many thought Roy could lose and was a tall, fast southpaw with a big name. Collins beat both UK fighters many had speculated about fighting Roy and called him out on numerous occasions. DM was undefeated in the same division and a long time title holder, feasting on the same caliber opponents Roy was. Any one of these fights is much more legacy enhancing than most of the fighters Roy chose to fight instead.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #127
                Originally posted by JAB5239

                Reason being they were at or around Jones weight and were better fighters than many who Roy was fighting. Nunn was a fight Many thought Roy could lose and was a tall, fast southpaw with a big name. Collins beat both UK fighters many had speculated about fighting Roy and called him out on numerous occasions. DM was undefeated in the same division and a long time title holder, feasting on the same caliber opponents Roy was. Any one of these fights is much more legacy enhancing than most of the fighters Roy chose to fight instead.

                At what weight are you referring to with Nunn? And when. And how.

                We'll get to Collins and DM in a sec.

                Comment

                • JAB5239
                  Dallas Cowboys
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 27706
                  • 5,034
                  • 4,436
                  • 73,018

                  #128
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  At what weight are you referring to with Nunn? And when. And how.

                  We'll get to Collins and DM in a sec.
                  Almost any time in the mid to late 90's at either 168 or 175. Besides Toney there wasn't a better fighter Roy would have faced.

                  Comment

                  • Allucard
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 5979
                    • 393
                    • 56
                    • 12,399

                    #129
                    Originally posted by Forza
                    RJJ fans have the nerve to criticize calzaghe when RJJ only has 2 or 3 credible wins on his entire resume.

                    Remember, when RJJ was fighting bums like the above mentioned, calzaghe was fighting guys like chris eubank and mikkel kessler, REAL BOXERS NOT PART TIMERS.

                    Eric lucas was a good fight though
                    Even if that was true, it would still be 1 or 2 more credible wins than Calzaghe. Roy was greater than an 0, Joe Calzaghe was not. Sorry dude.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #130
                      Originally posted by JAB5239
                      Almost any time in the mid to late 90's at either 168 or 175. Besides Toney there wasn't a better fighter Roy would have faced.
                      At 168? When were Nunn & Roy at 168 simultaneously? In 1994 when Nunn was losing to Littles and Jones was beating Toney? Yeah, that was viable. Oh wait, you mean at 175 after Nunn lost to Rochigianni, right?

                      Just STOP.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP