Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How does Dempsey match up against the 90's giant heavyweights?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    [QUOTE][QUOTE=sonnyboyx2;9944486]
    Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

    Willard vs Johnson was nothing like Lewis vs Tyson... Johnson was Heavyweight Champion Tyson was completely SHOT.
    Ali was heavyweight champ when he lost to Spinks, does anyone think he wasn't shot?
    Willard fought for 26rds in 100* heat.. Lewis was knackered by the 9th round against a "Shot" Tony Tucker.. Lewis was always gassed-out in most of his fights by the mid-rounds.

    Fighters fight differently and accordance to distance. Nit saying Willard didn't have fine stamina, but do you really think he was setting and continuing some sort of fast paced fight? If Lewis chose to fight at that pace during his career he would have been boo'd and never made a dime. The social climate and rules of the day have to be taken into consideration if you're going to use this argument.

    Holyfield was well past it when Lewis fought him to a draw and a decision win yet the decision win was very controversial... Floyd Johnson who Willard beat was in his prime.

    He beat Ruiz in his VERY next fight. The same Ruiz who you said Lewis was ducking because he had been beaten up in sparring. You can't have it both ways Sonny.

    Ray Mercer was beaten by Old Larry Holmes, Jesse Ferguson & coming into the Lewis fight off the back of a hammering from Holyfield.. so give us a break.

    The Holy fight was a tough, tough fight for both. Stop making it sound like a one sided drubbing. And we both know Mercer ran hot and cold. He stepped it up for his bigger fights and was lazy for the ones not so big.

    i can go along with your opinion of the "Lax medical opinion of the day" back in the early part of the century and the same applies today in that Lennox Lewis has NEVER been tested for anabolic steroid abuse yet there is an opinion by some that Lewis was a steroid abuser.

    And you can say the same for 99% of the fighters from his era so stop picking and choosing your spots.


    Let us not once again turn this subject into a Lennox Lewis argument by his supporters... it is now getting to the stage on this forum where if any member posts an opinion that they feel some past ATG beats Lewis then the thread is immediately turned upside-down and the Lewis fanboys come out to defend their hero and no matter how much evidence is placed before them that evidence is rubbished to the point of hilarity... Yet they never ever produce evidence to contradict the argument, it's as if all boxing followers have to toe-the-line when it comes to Lewis because his greatness is carved-in-stone and all other Heavyweight Champions careers and resumes can be called, ridiculed & rubbished without fear of response.

    Who exactly is turning this into a debate about Lewis? Are these not your words, from THIS thread?


    "Willard was as good as Lewis make no mistake about that"

    "Beating Jack Johnson out does anything Lewis achieved..."

    "Fighting 26rds in 100* heat out does anything Lewis did.."

    "Beating Floyd Johnson as good as any victory of Lewis..."

    "Willard able to take a tremendous amount of punishment and fight back unlike Lewis who was poleaxed twice by mediocre journeymen with neither journeyman ever able to KO an opponent in a similar fashion before or after their victory over Lewis..."

    Comment


    • #32
      [QUOTE=JAB5239;9946761][QUOTE]
      Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post

      Ali was heavyweight champ when he lost to Spinks, does anyone think he wasn't shot?


      Fighters fight differently and accordance to distance. Nit saying Willard didn't have fine stamina, but do you really think he was setting and continuing some sort of fast paced fight? If Lewis chose to fight at that pace during his career he would have been boo'd and never made a dime. The social climate and rules of the day have to be taken into consideration if you're going to use this argument.



      He beat Ruiz in his VERY next fight. The same Ruiz who you said Lewis was ducking because he had been beaten up in sparring. You can't have it both ways Sonny.



      The Holy fight was a tough, tough fight for both. Stop making it sound like a one sided drubbing. And we both know Mercer ran hot and cold. He stepped it up for his bigger fights and was lazy for the ones not so big.



      And you can say the same for 99% of the fighters from his era so stop picking and choosing your spots.




      Who exactly is turning this into a debate about Lewis? Are these not your words, from THIS thread?


      "Willard was as good as Lewis make no mistake about that"

      "Beating Jack Johnson out does anything Lewis achieved..."

      "Fighting 26rds in 100* heat out does anything Lewis did.."

      "Beating Floyd Johnson as good as any victory of Lewis..."

      "Willard able to take a tremendous amount of punishment and fight back unlike Lewis who was poleaxed twice by mediocre journeymen with neither journeyman ever able to KO an opponent in a similar fashion before or after their victory over Lewis..."
      laughable response..and so far off the mark it is pointless me replying

      Comment


      • #33
        [QUOTE=sonnyboyx2;9948521][QUOTE=JAB5239;9946761]

        laughable response..and so far off the mark it is pointless me replying

        All facts and logical opinions.

        Comment


        • #34
          [QUOTE=GJC;9946351]
          Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
          Don't get snippy Sonny. I see Dempsey beating them but that's Dempsey not Willard. Willard was a solid fighter but let's not make him out to be a world beater here!
          who is making him out to be a world beater GJC ?... because i never have, all i said was that Willard was as good as the other behemoths we have had who held the title like Lewis... Which is a long way short of making the guy out to be a "World Beater" .

          i am far from "Snippy" as you claim but it seems that there is quite a few on the forum who's only objective is to be "Snippy" with them never addressing any topic questions but just looking to pick-out certain wordings which they try to use to ridicule and call into question the other members response.

          How do you see the fights in question ending, i am intrigued to see your results

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Joey Giardello View Post
            Rid**** Bowe
            George Foreman
            Lennox Lewis
            Razor Ruddock
            Tommy Morrison

            Bowe's tendency to mix it up would get him in trouble.

            I don't think old George is quick enough to catch Dempsey while he makes his way inside. TKO Dempsey.

            Lewis could win but, there is more chance of a Dempsey KO in my opinion in a series of 3 I would call it 2-1 Dempsey.

            In physical prime Ruddock had a "Razor" like jab and could keep Dempsey off longer than the other fighters, his toughness also has to be respected and I think he(Ruddock) crawls across the finish line bloodied battered and fatigued with a few kncokdowns against him. Dempsey UD

            No conceivable way this fight could end unless something weird happens other than a Dempsey KO in less that 5 rounds.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Barnburner View Post
              Bowe's tendency to mix it up would get him in trouble.

              I don't think old George is quick enough to catch Dempsey while he makes his way inside. TKO Dempsey.

              Lewis could win but, there is more chance of a Dempsey KO in my opinion in a series of 3 I would call it 2-1 Dempsey.

              In physical prime Ruddock had a "Razor" like jab and could keep Dempsey off longer than the other fighters, his toughness also has to be respected and I think he(Ruddock) crawls across the finish line bloodied battered and fatigued with a few kncokdowns against him. Dempsey UD

              No conceivable way this fight could end unless something weird happens other than a Dempsey KO in less that 5 rounds.
              I agree with you. When I said Ruddock Dempsey would be a good fight it was thought by some to be laughable, but like you, I think in his prime Ruddock had a phenomenal ability to take a punch, get knocked down and get back up, and the ability to keep fighting through an immense amount of pain.

              Look at Ruddocks face, after he was brutalized for 12 rounds by Tyson, shattered eye socket and his jaw hanging from his face.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by CarlosG815 View Post
                I agree with you. When I said Ruddock Dempsey would be a good fight it was thought by some to be laughable, but like you, I think in his prime Ruddock had a phenomenal ability to take a punch, get knocked down and get back up, and the ability to keep fighting through an immense amount of pain.
                No says Ruddock wasn't tough, only that his skill set wasn't such as to make this a great fight.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                  No says Ruddock wasn't tough, only that his skill set wasn't such as to make this a great fight.
                  Arturo Gatti and Micky Ward never had the greatest skill set but they were in some great fights. Anybody with heart and toughness can make a great fight, despite lacking a great skill set.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by CarlosG815 View Post
                    Arturo Gatti and Micky Ward never had the greatest skill set but they were in some great fights. Anybody with heart and toughness can make a great fight, despite lacking a great skill set.

                    Neither were in great fights when they got into the ring with the elite fighters of their divisions.

                    Im not putting Ruddock down, he had heart. But the difference in skill has to be considered. Thats not to say he doesn't have a punchers chance or make for some rough spots with his superior size. But this fight seems like a white wash along the lines of Tyson-Ruddock.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Troll post its obvious he gets destroyed all the people who picked him here and on other sites are crazy trolls way to outdated and wild

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP