More exciting fight Pacquiao vs Hamed OR Trinidad vs Hearns

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeff Da Maori
    pōhara
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 808
    • 147
    • 404
    • 7,523

    #31
    Originally posted by CarlosG815
    Do you think Hamed could knock out Pacquiao?

    I like Hamed's chances in that fight but I couldn't bet my house on it. I believe it'd be a much better fight than most people might think.
    Hamed had ridiculous power. He rarely knocked people out with combinations, it was usually a flying fist from 12 yards away! Real 1 punch KO power is rare but look through his career and you will see ****** punches, thrown with no technique from bad angles but he was making guys do the PWill shuffle.

    I'd rather see Hearns vs Trinidad though. I'd watch a Hearns fight over any other fighter though, he is my favourite fighter of all time.
    IMO, Tommy is way too fast for Trinidad and would beat him to the punch repeatedly until Tito's chin gave out.

    Comment

    • CarlosG815
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 3683
      • 240
      • 192
      • 10,304

      #32
      Originally posted by Jeff Da Maori
      Hamed had ridiculous power. He rarely knocked people out with combinations, it was usually a flying fist from 12 yards away! Real 1 punch KO power is rare but look through his career and you will see ****** punches, thrown with no technique from bad angles but he was making guys do the PWill shuffle.

      I'd rather see Hearns vs Trinidad though. I'd watch a Hearns fight over any other fighter though, he is my favourite fighter of all time.
      IMO, Tommy is way too fast for Trinidad and would beat him to the punch repeatedly until Tito's chin gave out.
      I would agree with that also. Tommy Hearns was a wrecking machine. Incredible speed and an insane amount of power. He is a joy to watch.

      Comment

      • joseph5620
        undisputed
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 15564
        • 3,040
        • 5,611
        • 71,615

        #33
        Originally posted by Scott9945
        Both matchups are appealing, but I'd choose Pac-Hamed for sure. The atmosphere would just be electrifying for that one.
        That's the line of thinking I have on this one,Scott.

        Comment

        • rsf
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 403
          • 10
          • 0
          • 6,861

          #34
          hamed/pac the pre-fight build up would be amazing and the fight would match hearns and trinidad for excitement

          Comment

          • SCtrojansbaby
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 5951
            • 136
            • 72
            • 12,653

            #35
            No chance Hearns dominates Tito. Hearns might win but he couldn't dominate him. Tito unlike Hearns had true 2 handed power and it some point would hurt Hearns.

            Also calling Hamed a bum really shows how ****** you are.

            Comment

            • Kid McCoy
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 1029
              • 86
              • 155
              • 7,583

              #36
              Originally posted by CarlosG815
              Do you think Hamed could knock out Pacquiao?

              I like Hamed's chances in that fight but I couldn't bet my house on it. I believe it'd be a much better fight than most people might think.
              Pac is the superior fighter but Naz's power is a leveler here. Barrera had enough respect for Hamed's power to fight an unusually cautious fight. Naz would have a puncher's chance and Pac is no Willie Pep. Would be great to watch.

              Comment

              • CarlosG815
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 3683
                • 240
                • 192
                • 10,304

                #37
                Originally posted by Kid McCoy
                Pac is the superior fighter but Naz's power is a leveler here. Barrera had enough respect for Hamed's power to fight an unusually cautious fight. Naz would have a puncher's chance and Pac is no Willie Pep. Would be great to watch.
                I agree with everything you've said here. Nobody really mentions how Barrera fought cautiously and circled Hamed to take that hand away. That's how dangerous it was.

                Comment

                • The_Demon
                  Big dog
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 13603
                  • 1,354
                  • 888
                  • 22,971

                  #38
                  Both would be explosive fights but id rather see hamed/pac,its more evenly matched imo

                  Comment

                  • JAB5239
                    Dallas Cowboys
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 27751
                    • 5,040
                    • 4,437
                    • 73,018

                    #39
                    Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby
                    No chance Hearns dominates Tito. Hearns might win but he couldn't dominate him. Tito unlike Hearns had true 2 handed power and it some point would hurt Hearns.

                    Also calling Hamed a bum really shows how ****** you are.
                    Im sorry but unless you start backing your posts up with facts and/or logic Im going to start censoring them as I see them as only bait.

                    Hearns was superior in EVERY department than Tito. He was faster, hit harder, was a better boxer, had better footwork, bodywork and was taller. Tito was getting taken to school by Oscar. Hearns was outboxing Leonard till Sugar turned it into a brawl. Hearns by ko in 6.

                    Comment

                    • Barn
                      TheTartanSoldier
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2010
                      • 8647
                      • 675
                      • 624
                      • 42,074

                      #40
                      Originally posted by JAB5239
                      Im sorry but unless you start backing your posts up with facts and/or logic Im going to start censoring them as I see them as only bait.

                      Hearns was superior in EVERY department than Tito. He was faster, hit harder, was a better boxer, had better footwork, bodywork and was taller. Tito was getting taken to school by Oscar. Hearns was outboxing Leonard till Sugar turned it into a brawl. Hearns by ko in 6.
                      Wha, your kidding right? Hearns was from the 80's fighters evolved after that physically and, training got better as did nutrition so Tito would obviously win.
                      That's the feeling I'm getting from his posts.
                      I
                      think Pac Hamed would be better, both fighters have excellent power and decent chins, this could start of average but, by the middle rounds would have exploded into a war. I am unsure as to the outcome.
                      Hearns - Trinidad I see Hearns quite comfortably taking out Trinidad by Ko early or TKO Middle-Late.
                      Last edited by Barn; 12-02-2010, 03:29 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP