Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
H2H who was the greatest Super-Middleweight ever
Collapse
-
Originally posted by JoeyZagz View PostMy criteria for Prime is simply different than yours, I choose to go by the laws of nature that apply to every human being, not just boxers. Males begin to rapidly lose testosterone once they near 30. This is unescapable.
If you were to plot the performance of athletes from different sports like boxing, baseball, basketball, hockey and football, theyd probably all produce similar curves, and itd be hard to distinguish between the sports.
I understand there are other things at work in boxing, but age/physical prime is still the over-riding factor. To compare Roy/Zagz to a 37 year old fighting a 28 year old is absurd.
You cannot tell me Lennox Lewis was a better fighter at twenty-three than he was at thirty-three. I won't hear that Bernard Hopkins, at twenty-six, was better than the Bernard Hopkins of thirty-six. There are plenty of instances down through history.
To suggest that age over-rides all is, putting it in the simplest possible terms, not looking at the big picture.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JoeyZagz View PostMy criteria for Prime is simply different than yours, I choose to go by the laws of nature that apply to every human being, not just boxers. Males begin to rapidly lose testosterone once they near 30. This is unescapable.
If you were to plot the performance of athletes from different sports like boxing, baseball, basketball, hockey and football, theyd probably all produce similar curves, and itd be hard to distinguish between the sports.
I understand there are other things at work in boxing, but age/physical prime is still the over-riding factor. To compare Roy/Zagz to a 37 year old fighting a 28 year old is absurd.
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by CarlosG815 View PostSo you are claiming him to be the greatest super middleweight h2h based on one fight (that he lost)?
I would say that minus the bloodclot, Benn would have been gone in 2 or 3 brutal rounds...The case can be made that it was over when he first went down. Seeing as how Mcclellan battered Benn throughout the fight and was well ahead on scorecards is way more than is needed to replace Benn with Mcclellan, who was dieing throughout the entire fight. He beat Benn to the point of death before he had to take a knee...Seeing as how his brain was imploding since round 3...get my point?
I can see him taking Jones in the middle rounds at SMW, seeing as how Jones simply would not be able to hurt Mcclellan, but Mcclellan would easily be the hardest puncher Jones ever faced. Add onto that a 3-4 inch reach advantage for Mcclellan and I see a quick war, Mcclellan 4/5.
Comment
-
Originally posted by XionComrade View PostYes sir. Possibly the hardest puncher in Middleweight history(Or Jackson), fast hands, and the most solid chin of any fighter I have seen at Middleweight(Walked through Jackson's best shots)
I would say that minus the bloodclot, Benn would have been gone in 2 or 3 brutal rounds...The case can be made that it was over when he first went down. Seeing as how Mcclellan battered Benn throughout the fight and was well ahead on scorecards is way more than is needed to replace Benn with Mcclellan, who was dieing throughout the entire fight. He beat Benn to the point of death before he had to take a knee...Seeing as how his brain was imploding since round 3...get my point?
I can see him taking Jones in the middle rounds at SMW, seeing as how Jones simply would not be able to hurt Mcclellan, but Mcclellan would easily be the hardest puncher Jones ever faced. Add onto that a 3-4 inch reach advantage for Mcclellan and I see a quick war, Mcclellan 4/5.
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostThe problem is you can't rate someone in a weight class based on 1 fight and a lot of would of could of should of speculation over what might have been if only. I personally think Floyd Patterson would have been among the very best all-time at Light-Heavyweight.....but I don't rank him there because he was only at that weight long enough for a cup of coffee at the beginning of his career.
Poet
I see Jones completely bemusing McClellan for the bulk of the distance. It's a wide UD. McClellan would be in with a shot, I suppose, but it's going to be lightning-in-a-bottle material, as I see it, if he can put someone as supremely quick & evasive as Jones away.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Holtol View PostBoxing has been around for 150 years. To say that someone is the best just because he is in your memory is not logical. There most likely have been more talented boxers. Then the current boxers.
Boxing was not even a full time job for 95% of fighters until the mid 60s when the sport blew up with Ali and Don King. My uncle who fought in the 50s and 60s said that if you weren't Marciano, Louis or the like you were a what is known as a weekend warrior(had a day job and fit boxing around it)
Comment
-
Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby View PostThe competition is so far and away better now, seeing as how you aren't fighting weekend warriors.
Boxing was not even a full time job for 95% of fighters until the mid 60s when the sport blew up with Ali and Don King. My uncle who fought in the 50s and 60s said that if you weren't Marciano, Louis or the like you were a what is known as a weekend warrior(had a day job and fit boxing around it)
The biggest distinction between now & then, incidentally, is not related to nutrition, or training methods. The single biggest distinction actually detracts from your case, & that is that participation levels in Boxing have declined immensely, making the sport easier, not harder, to ascend.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild Blue Yonda View PostThat is still overwhelmingly the case today.
The biggest distinction between now & then, incidentally, is not related to nutrition, or training methods. The single biggest distinction actually detracts from your case, & that is that participation levels in Boxing have declined immensely, making the sport easier, not harder, to ascend.
Participation has declined because you can't pay someone 10 bucks to fight, hense there are less fights in general. If anything boxing may have been diluted because of all the fighters.
Comment
Comment