Originally posted by QueensburyRules
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Larry Holmes and Wladimir Klitschko. Titlereign comparison.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
Holmes was the champion, why does he need to offer the fight? The bout was originally supposed to be in SA, but both King and Holmes joined with Arthur Ashes and other athletes and celebrities in protest.
Coetzee would have been say a top 5 Holmes opponent and one with the right ingredients to pull off an upset. I'd pick Holmes to win but....
I don't think Coetzee was an advocate for aparthied his government was at the time. I'm glad the changed things and Coetzee was against apartheid. Read this. No Spoilers.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gerri...b0d6f0ba03fb40
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Z View Post
Holmes was champion and fought all except for a few. But IMO in this case he used social reasons and boxing politics to pull out if the fight. Odd he had no such issues when the fight was originally planned.
Coetzee would have been say a top 5 Holmes opponent and one with the right ingredients to pull off an upset. I'd pick Holmes to win but....
I don't think Coetzee was an advocate for aparthied his government was at the time. I'm glad the changed things and Coetzee was against apartheid. Read this. No Spoilers.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gerri...b0d6f0ba03fb40
Nice Article on Coetzee. He was never on board with apartheid and was always a class act.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
This is simply not true. At no time was Holmes on board with this fight happening in South Africa. When Weaver went over there in 1980 Holmes called him a traitor to his country and a traitor to his race. When King set up the Page fight after Holmes stuck by his convictions Larry said “I think King should be ashamed of himself, he’s always talking about his principles. It seems he sold em. If a man’s got principles, you can’t buy em.”
Nice Article on Coetzee. He was never on board with apartheid and was always a class act.JAB5239 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostIt's a common assumtion that the heavies of today are the worst crop ever. Outside the K-bros the contenders are terrible. Of course it's a subjective reasoning.
My feeling is that the era of Joe Louis and more recently Larry Holmes also had a pretty weak cast.
This thread will show a strenght comparison between the (alphabet) titlereigns of Larry Holmes and Wlad Klitschko.
For the sake of this thread I will only measure Larry Holmes 'first' career and deal with Wlad's as if he retired today.
Record in titlefights:
Wlad: 16-2 (14 KO's)
Holmes: 20-3 (14 KO's)
Strenght of schedule (Ring magazine ranking of opponent):
U = Outside top 10.
RED = Loss
Wlad: 10, U, U, U, U, 9, U, U, 1, 7, U, 7, 6, 8, U, 3, 4, U
Holmes: 3, 8, 10, 4, 5, 7, 6, 10, U, 7, 8, 11, 3, 10, 0, 10, 4, 9, U, 1, 1.
Notable opponents not fought:
Wlad: Vitali Klitschko, David Haye, Lennox Lewis.
Holmes: Mike Weaver II, Micheal Dokes, Pinklon Thomas.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Z View Post
Holmes was champion and fought all except for a few. But IMO in this case he used social reasons and boxing politics to pull out if the fight. Odd he had no such issues when the fight was originally planned.
Coetzee would have been say a top 5 Holmes opponent and one with the right ingredients to pull off an upset. I'd pick Holmes to win but....
I don't think Coetzee was an advocate for aparthied his government was at the time. I'm glad the changed things and Coetzee was against apartheid. Read this. No Spoilers.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gerri...b0d6f0ba03fb40
Dr. Z likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment