I think Frazier-Foreman was actually very much a wake-up call for Frazier, and he was better off for it. He was interested in everything but boxing by 1973 and didn't have the fire of old, although he was still a capable fighter. He got the "hunger" back after Foreman beat him down in devastating fashion and especially after Ali beat him the second time, until the Thrilla in Manila where he gave it his all and was never the same.
If Ali-Frazier II happens in 1973 instead of Foreman-Frazier, I see Ali winning much the same way as he did in their actual rematch. This time Ali would have been the one who was more determined to win. He absolutely could not afford to lose.
Ali also made the necessary technical adjustments, such as at times excessive clinching to prevent Frazier from working in close, while Frazier regressed as a fighter, mostly looking for the big left hook without working the body.
If Ali-Frazier II happens in 1973 instead of Foreman-Frazier, I see Ali winning much the same way as he did in their actual rematch. This time Ali would have been the one who was more determined to win. He absolutely could not afford to lose.
Ali also made the necessary technical adjustments, such as at times excessive clinching to prevent Frazier from working in close, while Frazier regressed as a fighter, mostly looking for the big left hook without working the body.
Comment