Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Does Pacquiao Have To Do, To Surpass Ray Leonard?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Leonard only agreed to fight Duran after losing to him in Montreal because he knew Duran balooned after fights and would have great difficulty getting down to 147lbs which showed in the fight as Duran quit with stomach cramps... Leonard only agreed to fight Hagler because he knew Hagler was old and faded.. i wont mention Donny LaLonde because its too ****** to talk about, which leaves us with Ray Leonards greatest victories being Hearns (1) when Hearns ran out of gas as he had never fought beyond 10rds in his life and Leonard beating Duran in their 3rd fight which was pathetic... so its very easy for me to call into question the career of Ray Leonard, i could start to randomly select several fighters from that era and make a claim that Leonard avoided them which seems to be the norm on this board of late, just like the clown above who is claiming Pacquiao avoided Guzman & Zahir which is bull****.. i have always been a huge fan of Ray Leonard my posts varify that, i am also a huge fan of Pacquiao because his achievements are phenominal as well as his skills, so putting it into perspective the topic question of "What does Pacquiao have to do to surpass Leonard in terms of greatness" - The answer is - "NOTHING just keep doing what he is doing now, which is being the true champion he is and the flag bearer for this great sport.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
      Leonard only agreed to fight Duran after losing to him in Montreal because he knew Duran balooned after fights and would have great difficulty getting down to 147lbs which showed in the fight as Duran quit with stomach cramps... Leonard only agreed to fight Hagler because he knew Hagler was old and faded.. i wont mention Donny LaLonde because its too ****** to talk about, which leaves us with Ray Leonards greatest victories being Hearns (1) when Hearns ran out of gas as he had never fought beyond 10rds in his life and Leonard beating Duran in their 3rd fight which was pathetic... so its very easy for me to call into question the career of Ray Leonard, i could start to randomly select several fighters from that era and make a claim that Leonard avoided them which seems to be the norm on this board of late, just like the clown above who is claiming Pacquiao avoided Guzman & Zahir which is bull****.. i have always been a huge fan of Ray Leonard my posts varify that, i am also a huge fan of Pacquiao because his achievements are phenominal as well as his skills, so putting it into perspective the topic question of "What does Pacquiao have to do to surpass Leonard in terms of greatness" - The answer is - "NOTHING just keep doing what he is doing now, which is being the true champion he is and the flag bearer for this great sport.
      There's a lot of truth in this..

      Comment


      • #53
        KO JMM at 130.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Loccy View Post
          KO JMM at 130.
          Nice avy. Is that Carl Froch's girlfriend?

          Comment


          • #55
            How many times did sonnyboy throw around the word "hate"?

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by wmute View Post
              How many times did sonnyboy throw around the word "hate"?
              Yeah, like I said, it's become the standard word to toss around when you don't actually have a decent reply.

              I still love the 'Morales was nowhere near past it in those fights'. I'm still laughing about that one.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
                Leonard only agreed to fight Hagler because he knew Hagler was old and faded...
                Leonard wasn't? He came out of retirement for that ****.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by BennyST View Post
                  Yeah, like I said, it's become the standard word to toss around when you don't actually have a decent reply.

                  I still love the 'Morales was nowhere near past it in those fights'. I'm still laughing about that one.
                  you obviously have not seen Pacquiao vs Morales (2)

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
                    you obviously have not seen Pacquiao vs Morales (2)
                    Morales looking more hittable than ever looking like he was getting ready to gas out/give up by the mid rounds. You gonna say this was the same beast from 122? stop lying to yourself. and the reason i went on like i did with duran is because of the calibre of fighter that he is and the fact that leonard beat him in the manner that he did, there is not one single fighter on Durans level on pacs resume, not ****ing one.

                    How many fighters on pacs resume have:
                    Gone on to have another career defining fight?
                    Became a legit threat to their division again?

                    I think i just get annoyed at your posts and your points, with your arguments being all over the place how can you expect uniform logic in the way its argued?
                    Last edited by El Jesus; 04-24-2010, 11:01 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      If he proves he's not a juicer I'd say he's already greater than Leonard.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP