Muhammad Ali vs The Supersized Heavyweights
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Makes you wonder if speed might be a factor that does count a little?Comment
-
I wouldn't argue that Steward has managed to paper over Wlad's weaknesses but they are still there. You could also say the opposition is not of the quality to exploit those weaknesses.Comment
-
well,if we agree that ther have been only 7 or 8 A fighters in heavy history then we can also agree that outta so called great fighters or contenders from the golden era are B and C level fighters.with that being said,all of these A guys have lost to lesser opposition,but that shouldnt cloud judgement on how they would perform against 1 another.for instance,i rate ali,and foreman as the A guys of the 70's.they both lost to B nnd C guys in norton and young.were most of these debates take a turn for this worse is when guys act like C guys from that time were better than C guys from this time.i think thats completly falseComment
-
Since Ezzard Fan, GJC, and Sonnyboyx are handling this so well anything I might add would be piling on......green K forthcoming as soon as it allows me.
PS. I've seen statues with more mobility and faster hands than Wlad
PoetComment
-
yes cause big george,chuvalo,quarry and mathis moved like ray robinsonComment
-
they fought ruiz.at that time,lewis was still the man and the klits were coming up.i wouldveloved to see that mccline vs toney fight,but mccline got injured i believeComment
-
Comment
-
I'd give Lewis the best shot, then Wlad, then Vitali. I'd favor Ali over all three, though none would be quite as easy as some would like to believe.
One thing about Ali, he always found a way to win, even when past his best. Truly a once in a lifetime fighter.Comment
Comment