Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which Boxer Had The Best and Worst Wife, Girlfriend (looks and influence)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by BKM- View Post

    All due respect, that link is quite a block of text and I quit reading at this part.

    It already starts out with a lie. So you're gonna have to convince me that it's worth reading.

    I did not ask you for an autobiography precisely for that reason.

    If you have any other interview where he blames nobody but himself for his long list of actions I'm willing to read it. And yes, that includes not 'sharing' half the blame for "his part".
    The problem lies exactly here. You don't read. But you're very smart in selecting the segments that might validate your theories, discarding the ones which might suggest a different interpretation. By the way, many interviews are also tampered with by the very reporters, not only books.

    Look, at the end of the day - and I already told you several times - I do believe you're a decent man, and I'm sure that we would talk in depth if we were eye to eye. It's just this blind hate for Tyson that I struggle to understand, though you have made many of your points clear. Perhaps this will pass over the years; in my 30s I used to hate Oscar De La Hoya exactly as you hate Tyson. Now I watch him, ridiculously stoned and fat like a hog, and I almost feel sorry for him.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

      - - She was very tight with BALCO Vic who wrote the book on drug testing. Goodman is a space cadet posing with an illicitly obtained Doctor's License, a useful idiot for the corrupt Vegas Commish...

      Unfortunately U don't even qualify as a Useful Idjit...
      No, she wasn't actually. You've just made that up also.

      Victor Conte had NOTHING to do with the founding of VADA. Nothing. Zero.

      You just made that up as per usual.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

        No, she wasn't actually. You've just made that up also.

        Victor Conte had NOTHING to do with the founding of VADA. Nothing. Zero.

        You just made that up as per usual.
        You actually bother to read that imbecile's posts rather than just skim over them?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Coverdale View Post

          You actually bother to read that imbecile's posts rather than just skim over them?
          Usually I do exactly that
          Coverdale Coverdale likes this.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Tatabanya View Post

            The problem lies exactly here. You don't read. But you're very smart in selecting the segments that might validate your theories, discarding the ones which might suggest a different interpretation. By the way, many interviews are also tampered with by the very reporters, not only books.

            Look, at the end of the day - and I already told you several times - I do believe you're a decent man, and I'm sure that we would talk in depth if we were eye to eye. It's just this blind hate for Tyson that I struggle to understand, though you have made many of your points clear. Perhaps this will pass over the years; in my 30s I used to hate Oscar De La Hoya exactly as you hate Tyson. Now I watch him, ridiculously stoned and fat like a hog, and I almost feel sorry for him.
            You're asking a little too much there bud. That's like several pages of Tysonism which will take up significant time I doubt is worth it. If you can take out any good parts worth posting here I'd be happy to take a look.

            I'm curious now, why De La Hoya? With me it's mostly a moral issue with Tyson I have some doubt you can compare Oscar to kind of laundry list

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by BKM- View Post

              You're asking a little too much there bud. That's like several pages of Tysonism which will take up significant time I doubt is worth it. If you can take out any good parts worth posting here I'd be happy to take a look.

              I'm curious now, why De La Hoya? With me it's mostly a moral issue with Tyson I have some doubt you can compare Oscar to kind of laundry list
              Haha, no worry at all, I'm not a teacher asking to do homework. And yes, no one can beat Tyson in terms of turbulent existence

              Why De La Hoya? I always perceived him as a fake, I couldn't stand that strained Joker smile, and I didn't like the way the boxing establishment decided that he was "the one". Incidentally, another very good read is Tim Kawakami's book The Golden Boy, which largely confirmed my suspìcion about Oscar's shadowy character. I think his post-fighting trajectory speaks for itself.
              Last edited by Tatabanya; 05-05-2025, 02:17 PM.
              BKM- BKM- likes this.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Tatabanya View Post

                The problem lies exactly here. You don't read. But you're very smart in selecting the segments that might validate your theories, discarding the ones which might suggest a different interpretation. By the way, many interviews are also tampered with by the very reporters, not only books.

                Look, at the end of the day - and I already told you several times - I do believe you're a decent man, and I'm sure that we would talk in depth if we were eye to eye. It's just this blind hate for Tyson that I struggle to understand, though you have made many of your points clear. Perhaps this will pass over the years; in my 30s I used to hate Oscar De La Hoya exactly as you hate Tyson. Now I watch him, ridiculously stoned and fat like a hog, and I almost feel sorry for him.
                sometimes it is hard for a young boy who is being encouraged to be violent and aggressive and destroy the other person then finds it hard to restrain themselves at other people when those other people are making their lives miserable. I learned that iron mike had such a hard, rough start to life. At least he knows to make amends. He has been trying for twenty years to make up for the harshness of his younger self and I admire that in him.
                Tatabanya Tatabanya likes this.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Still no photos. Sad.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by MarbleFallsMauler View Post
                    Still no photos. Sad.
                    - - Nobody want to see GoldenBoy in fishnets with a h00ker.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by BKM- View Post

                      I will tire you out with this stuff untill your already half functioning brain ceases to function(This won't be a hard task, that I can tell you). That way I tell the truth and rid society of you, killing two birds with one stone. I won't use pigeons though out of respect for Mike.

                      There are two types of Tyson fans. The creature who fully denies all of his wrong doings, glorifies everything he does while blaming everyone but him for his troubles. And then there is the more sensible one who has his heart in the right place but gets manipulated by Tyson's woo-is-me shtick. It's safe to say this drooling imbecile doesn't fall into the latter category, but I am in fact dealing with both types in this thread.
                      What you should do is wake up the brain you put to bed. Any moron who believes Tyson hit Givens hard is an automatic laughing stock. You have already tired me out with this halfwitted persistence in the face of any logic. Find a new goal.
                      Willie Pep 229 Willie Pep 229 likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP