SRR the goat?

[Slugfester]

You have no solid basis for stating Walcott won this fight,you have only seen edited highlights.

I have never said who won the fight,I like to think I've got enough common sense not to judge a fight on a few edited highlights which add up to about 7 minutes at most!

My contention has always been that, no fight so close can be a robbery.just as Leonard beating Hagler was not a robbery.

Louis was boxing under the same rules as Walcott so the fight was judged on an equal basis for both men.For the record the complete fight is NOT AVAILABLE.
"likely not"" must have"
Your intuition? What is that worth?

Judging the fight on "circumstantial evidence ."is precisely what you are doing!

As far as common sense you give yourself way too much credit. Someone with common sense does not get online every day to argue with Z year after year.

And if you had to bet and the truth were knowable, you would bet that Walcott won. If you say any different I know you are a liar. Without knowing, you would vote that Walcott won from what you have watched. Right? Nobody is going to look at what is available of that fight and say Louis must have won. Most people are not ****** enough to think Louis won the rest of the fight other than what is shown. Don't come back with typical crap that you would never do such a thing. Because, let's suppose you have to, or you will die. You aren't betting that Louis actually won.You are betting that Walcott must have won. I already know this is true, so go ahead and lie if it is that important.

[Willow The Wisp]

It should probably be GOATs, since the issue can never rest at just 1. But if you said: "In no order, it is Langford, Greb and Robinson," there would likely be less to dispute. Another way is divisional GOATs.

A ranking of Typical or Classic G.O.A.T picks:
1. Sugar Ray Robinson
2. Henry Armstrong
3. Sam Langford
4. Wille Pep
5. Harry Greb
6. Benny Leonard
7. Muhammad Ali
8. Roberto Duran
9. Joe Louis
10. Manny Pacquiao
11. Jack Dempsey
12. Jack Johnson
13. Mickey Walker
14. Ezzard Charles
15. Tony Canzoneri
16. Marvin Hagler
17. Gene Tunney
18. Larry Holmes
19. Joe Gans
20. Sugar Ray Leonard
21. Floyd Mayweather
22. Julio Cesar Chavez
23. Jimmy Wilde
24. Rocky Marciano
25. Carlos Monzon
26. Lennox Lewis
27. Alexis Arguello
28. Stanley Ketchel
29. Barney Ross
30. Salvador Sanchez / Roy Jones Jr.


Who would you add?

[Slugfester]

A ranking of Typical or Classic G.O.A.T picks:
1. Sugar Ray Robinson
2. Henry Armstrong
3. Sam Langford
4. Wille Pep
5. Harry Greb
6. Benny Leonard
7. Muhammad Ali
8. Roberto Duran
9. Joe Louis
10. Manny Pacquiao
11. Jack Dempsey
12. Jack Johnson
13. Mickey Walker
14. Ezzard Charles
15. Tony Canzoneri
16. Marvin Hagler
17. Gene Tunney
18. Larry Holmes
19. Joe Gans
20. Sugar Ray Leonard
21. Floyd Mayweather
22. Julio Cesar Chavez
23. Jimmy Wilde
24. Rocky Marciano
25. Carlos Monzon
26. Lennox Lewis
27. Alexis Arguello
28. Stanley Ketchel
29. Barney Ross
30. Salvador Sanchez / Roy Jones Jr.


Who would you add?

The only one a relative stranger is Ross.

[JAB5239]

The only one a relative stranger is Ross.

Ross was an amazing fighter with a fantastic resume. I personally would have him inside the top 20.

[Slugfester]

Ross was an amazing fighter with a fantastic resume. I personally would have him inside the top 20.

Was McLarnin his best opponent?

[QueensburyRules]

Was McLarnin his best opponent?

- - Henry Armstrong...

[cfang]

Charles is too low on that list. Him beating Moore 3/3, stepping out of the lh division to become heavy champ and then going life or death with Marciano alone puts him top ten.

[cfang]

Also in one 12 month period he knocked out Moore, Marshall, ray and outpointed bivins. Unbelievable record

[Ivich]

As far as common sense you give yourself way too much credit. Someone with common sense does not get online every day to argue with Z year after year.

And if you had to bet and the truth were knowable, you would bet that Walcott won. If you say any different I know you are a liar. Without knowing, you would vote that Walcott won from what you have watched. Right? Nobody is going to look at what is available of that fight and say Louis must have won. Most people are not ****** enough to think Louis won the rest of the fight other than what is shown. Don't come back with typical crap that you would never do such a thing. Because, let's suppose you have to, or you will die. You aren't betting that Louis actually won.You are betting that Walcott must have won. I already know this is true, so go ahead and lie if it is that important.

I'll just make this observation and then drop it ,and you.
Nat Fleischer
James P Dawson
JohnLardner
Red Smith
And seven other boxing writers voted for Louis
The two judges,voted for Louis.
The referee gave the verdict to Walcott by a single round.
To me that indicates .a very close fight one which ,not having seen in its entirety I am not prepared to venture a verdict on
Your opinion of me is as important ,and welcome to me as a piece of dog **** on my shoe.
I have no opinion of you, you aren't even on my radar.
I will correct Z's lies when I see them,I do not debate with him and neither will I do so with you in the future.You Z and Queenie are lumped together as far as I am concerned,and I wish you joy of your company.Now **** off!

[QueensburyRules]

Charles is too low on that list. Him beating Moore 3/3, stepping out of the lh division to become heavy champ and then going life or death with Marciano alone puts him top ten.

- - Ez always been top 10 LH/P4P…see IBRO…