Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who rates higher, Hagler or Monzon?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Monzon UD (close)

    In a fight that Monzon never lets become a brawl; a fight that never reaches its expectation of excitement.

    No Hagler-Hearns
    mrbig1 mrbig1 Ivich Ivich like this.

    Comment


    • #32
      Hagler of course. Monzon was unskilled flat footed slow hypejob with poor resume.

      I rank Robinson higher than him at 160 as well.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Silence View Post
        Hagler of course. Monzon was unskilled flat footed slow hypejob with poor resume.

        I rank Robinson higher than him at 160 as well.
        billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
          Monzon UD (close)

          In a fight that Monzon never lets become a brawl; a fight that never reaches its expectation of excitement.

          No Hagler-Hearns
          Exactly how I see it.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Silence View Post
            Hagler of course. Monzon was unskilled flat footed slow hypejob with poor resume.

            I rank Robinson higher than him at 160 as well.
            - - I reckon both would KO Bubber save he gonna duck'em...

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

              - - I reckon both would KO Bubber save he gonna duck'em...
              You think so?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Ivich View Post
                Good objective points, but it should be noted that Hagler lost his first fights with both Monroe and Watts,and Briscoe was 35 years old when Hagler beat him.
                True though the Watts fight was not a just decision. He did avenge both defeats.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Silence View Post
                  Hagler of course. Monzon was unskilled flat footed slow hypejob with poor resume.

                  I rank Robinson higher than him at 160 as well.
                  Both Hagler and Monzon had consistent uninterrupted title reigns. I would probably rank them as better Middleweight Champions than Sugar Ray but the best version of Robinson at Middleweight 1949-52 would IMO be too much for both of them.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by DooGee#33 View Post

                    Both Hagler and Monzon had consistent uninterrupted title reigns. I would probably rank them as better Middleweight Champions than Sugar Ray but the best version of Robinson at Middleweight 1949-52 would IMO be too much for both of them.
                    I'd have no problem with anyone placing any of the 3 at the top.I'd probably put Greb there myself.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Silence View Post
                      Hagler of course. Monzon was unskilled flat footed slow hypejob with poor resume.

                      I rank Robinson higher than him at 160 as well.
                      - - Shame Marv had 5 years overlap with Monzon yet never in position to challenge because he was too busy avenging his losses to journeymen.

                      Nobody cares what a growed man still stuck in 3rd grade thinks anyway.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP