Joe Frazier vs Jack Johnson

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QueensburyRules
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2018
    • 21830
    • 2,354
    • 17
    • 187,708

    #31
    Originally posted by billeau2

    Did you watch those fights? Especially the Young fight?
    - - Bingo! Troll alt program.

    Comment

    • billeau2
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2012
      • 27644
      • 6,396
      • 14,933
      • 339,839

      #32
      Originally posted by QueensburyRules

      - - Bingo! Troll alt program.
      They are all on Utube lol. Its not like when you had to wait for a sydicate program like "the way we were" to show the great fights of the past.

      Comment

      • Ingo Bingo
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Aug 2022
        • 15
        • 2
        • 3
        • 0

        #33
        Yes, I have seen those fights. I have been following the heavyweight division for over 50 years now.

        Comment

        • kara
          Master of Disaster
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2004
          • 3267
          • 1,308
          • 277
          • 8,425

          #34
          Originally posted by Ingo Bingo
          Yes, I have seen those fights. I have been following the heavyweight division for over 50 years now.
          This man knows his heavyweights

          Comment

          • Ascended
            word don't matter to i
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2020
            • 1928
            • 86
            • 1,701
            • 1,010

            #35
            Frazier would destroy him no one made midcard fighting like Jack in 70s,way to obsolete

            Comment

            • Ascended
              word don't matter to i
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2020
              • 1928
              • 86
              • 1,701
              • 1,010

              #36
              Originally posted by shawnkemp804
              A primitive boxer from the late 1800's early 1900's versus a modern skilled boxer? Lol Frazier would destroy Johnson.
              The average amateur would from 30-40s would let alone one in 70s

              Comment

              • sleazyfellow
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 2676
                • 572
                • 212
                • 11,978

                #37
                Jack had a great uppercut, but I feel Frazier is just too much. If you could get Johnson with a more modern training program and bulk him up a bit more he might be a problem. The eras are just so different, one where they were barely coming out of the bare knuckle stuff and basically learning on the job vs Fraziers era which we all know about how great it is.

                Comment

                • Ivich
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 4377
                  • 1,640
                  • 2,302
                  • 6,015

                  #38
                  Originally posted by GhostofDempsey
                  If they each fought in their respective styles during their prime, Frazier wins it easily. Johnson wouldn’t have a size advantage as he did with his best wins over Burns, Ketchel, Jeannette, Langford, Kaufman, Fitz, etc. he also wouldn’t be able to get away with his holding and clinching tactics he used to wrestle and wear down smaller opponents.
                  Wlad got away with holding and clinching,why wouldn't Johnson?

                  Comment

                  • Ivich
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2013
                    • 4377
                    • 1,640
                    • 2,302
                    • 6,015

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Ingo Bingo

                    To lose fights isnīt always a bad thing. It could be a learning experience. In those days it was. They werenīt as protected as they are today. I think Johnson
                    vs Foreman would be an easier fight for Johnson than the fight against Frazier. Foreman had few tools in the box. He was very predictable.
                    Foreman had a jab a left hook a right cross and an uppercut,thats more tools than Frazier ever showed us! Frazier fought the same way everytime his stature demanded that he did ,he was the predictable one.
                    Last edited by Ivich; 10-15-2023, 06:46 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Dr. Z
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2020
                      • 4527
                      • 1,160
                      • 1,362
                      • 12,768

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Ivich
                      Wlad got away with holding and clinching,why wouldn't Johnson?
                      Johnson only did well clinching smaller men, shorter men, lighter men, or older past their prime men on film. He could not clinch with Willard, he was smart enough not even to try! That what the film shows. Do you watch it?

                      That is why he could not clinch vs. Wlad. With his low guard, lean back defensive style, and mostly stationary feet , Johnson had neither the chin, the size, or the style to last long. Or the one punch power to get lucky. He did not throw may punches either.

                      This fantasy fight is a mismatch. Big time. Wlad via KO within six rounds.
                      Last edited by Dr. Z; 10-15-2023, 07:31 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP