- - Ask Dan the Ham who rates Field higher than you.
What experimental drugs was Tyson on, and how did he go 11 hard fought rounds with Holyfield if he was just a 4 round fighter? You won't answer just like you can't answer where and when Tyson and Foreman signed to fight in China.
What experimental drugs was Tyson on, and how did he go 11 hard fought rounds with Holyfield if he was just a 4 round fighter? You won't answer just like you can't answer where and when Tyson and Foreman signed to fight in China.
I'm asking you, ya Muppet. You made these lies up, I'm just asking for you to back them up. You won't though because you can't. It's par for the course on anything you get called out lying about.
I'm asking you, ya Muppet. You made these lies up, I'm just asking for you to back them up. You won't though because you can't. It's par for the course on anything you get called out lying about.
He consensus view at the time was Holyfield was shot, and Tyson was no where close to shot. But again a case of hindsight being 20-20.
Holyfield was well past it, and yet he battered and stoppedTyson with ease.
He is clearly the vastly superior fighter.
Resume shows that, H2H shows that, from every angle is shows that.
Holyfield was far closer to his best performances against Bowe & Lennox than Tyson was to his performances against Holmes & Spinks.
Again, Tyson was in prison for 3 years, so nobody knew how shot or not shot he was. You're looking at the marketing of Tyson who was still marketed at 1987 Tyson.
King put him in there with McNeilly, Buster Mathis, and Bruno, but he wasn't anywhere near his peak form .
Holyfield's best performance at heavyweight was only a few years earlier while Tyson was in prison.
You actually have to watch the fights, not just look at who's chronologically younger and who "shouldn't be shot".
Wilfred Benitez was shot at like 25-26.
Bernard Hopkins was still going at 49.
Tyson's peak form was at 22/23
Holyfield's at 30.
In '96, Tyson was 8 years past his best performance.
Holyfield was far closer to his best performances against Bowe & Lennox than Tyson was to his performances against Holmes & Spinks.
Again, Tyson was in prison for 3 years, so nobody knew how shot or not shot he was. You're looking at the marketing of Tyson who was still marketed at 1987 Tyson.
King put him in there with McNeilly, Buster Mathis, and Bruno, but he wasn't anywhere near his peak form .
Holyfield's best performance at heavyweight was only a few years earlier while Tyson was in prison.
You actually have to watch the fights, not just look at who's chronologically younger and who "shouldn't be shot".
Wilfred Benitez was shot at like 25-26.
Bernard Hopkins was still going at 49.
Tyson's peak form was at 22/23
Holyfield's at 30.
In '96, Tyson was 8 years past his best performance.
Holyfield was only 3 years past his.
Who said anything about age?
Holyfield, at the time, was considered further passed his best and that is based off their performances, not their age.
Any way you look at it, Holyfield is the vastly superior fighter.
He showed it in the ring H2H, and it showed it their comparative careers.
Comment