Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Top 10 HW ever in terms of H2H

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

    A drugged 4 round fighter? Than how did he go eleven competitive rounds with Holy the first fight? You making up conspiracy theories again?
    - - Dan the Ham sez Field shut Tyson out.

    Maybe U 2 should huddle together.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

      - - Dan the Ham sez Field shut Tyson out.

      Maybe U 2 should huddle together.
      What would his opinion and my opinion have to do with your conspiracy theories?

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

        What would his opinion and my opinion have to do with your conspiracy theories?
        - - Ask Dan the Ham who rates Field higher than you.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

          - - Ask Dan the Ham who rates Field higher than you.
          What experimental drugs was Tyson on, and how did he go 11 hard fought rounds with Holyfield if he was just a 4 round fighter? You won't answer just like you can't answer where and when Tyson and Foreman signed to fight in China.
          nathan sturley max baer likes this.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

            What experimental drugs was Tyson on, and how did he go 11 hard fought rounds with Holyfield if he was just a 4 round fighter? You won't answer just like you can't answer where and when Tyson and Foreman signed to fight in China.
            - - Axt Dan the Ham fer his pearls...

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

              - - Axt Dan the Ham fer his pearls...
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_Opt9bJlqg
              for queeny.
              --
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5j_4XaLfko
              Last edited by max baer; 01-21-2023, 12:53 PM.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

                - - Axt Dan the Ham fer his pearls...
                I'm asking you, ya Muppet. You made these lies up, I'm just asking for you to back them up. You won't though because you can't. It's par for the course on anything you get called out lying about.
                nathan sturley max baer likes this.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

                  I'm asking you, ya Muppet. You made these lies up, I'm just asking for you to back them up. You won't though because you can't. It's par for the course on anything you get called out lying about.
                  - - OK, U askeered of Dan da Ham.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                    He consensus view at the time was Holyfield was shot, and Tyson was no where close to shot. But again a case of hindsight being 20-20.

                    Holyfield was well past it, and yet he battered and stoppedTyson with ease.

                    He is clearly the vastly superior fighter.

                    Resume shows that, H2H shows that, from every angle is shows that.
                    Holyfield was far closer to his best performances against Bowe & Lennox than Tyson was to his performances against Holmes & Spinks.

                    Again, Tyson was in prison for 3 years, so nobody knew how shot or not shot he was. You're looking at the marketing of Tyson who was still marketed at 1987 Tyson.

                    King put him in there with McNeilly, Buster Mathis, and Bruno, but he wasn't anywhere near his peak form .

                    Holyfield's best performance at heavyweight was only a few years earlier while Tyson was in prison.

                    You actually have to watch the fights, not just look at who's chronologically younger and who "shouldn't be shot".

                    Wilfred Benitez was shot at like 25-26.

                    Bernard Hopkins was still going at 49.

                    Tyson's peak form was at 22/23

                    Holyfield's at 30.

                    In '96, Tyson was 8 years past his best performance.

                    Holyfield was only 3 years past his.
                    Last edited by The D3vil; 01-23-2023, 07:17 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by The D3vil View Post

                      Holyfield was far closer to his best performances against Bowe & Lennox than Tyson was to his performances against Holmes & Spinks.

                      Again, Tyson was in prison for 3 years, so nobody knew how shot or not shot he was. You're looking at the marketing of Tyson who was still marketed at 1987 Tyson.

                      King put him in there with McNeilly, Buster Mathis, and Bruno, but he wasn't anywhere near his peak form .

                      Holyfield's best performance at heavyweight was only a few years earlier while Tyson was in prison.

                      You actually have to watch the fights, not just look at who's chronologically younger and who "shouldn't be shot".

                      Wilfred Benitez was shot at like 25-26.

                      Bernard Hopkins was still going at 49.

                      Tyson's peak form was at 22/23

                      Holyfield's at 30.

                      In '96, Tyson was 8 years past his best performance.

                      Holyfield was only 3 years past his.
                      Who said anything about age?

                      Holyfield, at the time, was considered further passed his best and that is based off their performances, not their age.

                      Any way you look at it, Holyfield is the vastly superior fighter.

                      He showed it in the ring H2H, and it showed it their comparative careers.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP