Talking Boxing - Your Screening Question?
Collapse
-
Notably, he wasn't a slugger, but wif his huge hands and size and strength, he was a fearsome choker. He had as one of our more esteemed boxing experts would weigh in, "impressive milking muscle."Comment
-
Louis -> Sharkey -> Wills -> Johnson -> Jeffries -> Corbett -> Sullivan.
DAMN IT - that's seven!
ON A DIFFERENT NOTE
I wonder how short of chain can we get from from Fury to Sullivan?
Fury -> Wald -> Lewis -> Tyson -> Holmes -> Ali -> Moore -> Marciano -> Louis -> Sharkey -> Wills -> Jeffries -> Corbett -> Sullivan.
14 degrees of separation. Can anyone get there faster?Comment
-
Comment
-
Not missing, I was trying for as short a chain as possible.
No Wills wasn't supose to fight Jeffries, Johnson was the connection between the two.
I misunderstood I thought you were connecting lineal chains of fights (history) back to Sullivan.
I guess I made up my own game, sorry!
What are the rules? LOLComment
-
From the top of the thread:: Sullivan > Corbett > Fitzsimmons > Johnson > Willard > Dempsey > Sharkey > Louis > Marciano > Moore > Ali > Holmes > Tyson - 12 jumps. Do I hear 11???Comment
-
-
Sorry I blew the Wald outright I thought they fought. Breaks the chain to Fury.
Not missing, I was trying for as short a chain as possible.
No Wills wasn't supose to fight Jeffries, Johnson was the connection between the two.
I misunderstood I thought you were connecting lineal chains of fights (history) back to Sullivan.
I guess I made up my own game, sorry!
What are the rules? LOL
Comment
-
Comment
Comment