Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nemeses

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
    Then that's not a nemesis!
    Correct, but we keep playing this game after all...
    Willie Pep 229 Willie Pep 229 likes this.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Tatabanya View Post

      Correct, but we keep playing this game after all...
      Any excuse to make yet another list . Lol
      Tatabanya Tatabanya likes this.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post

        Any excuse to make yet another list . Lol
        Where did the quote in your signature come from?

        Comment


        • #54
          Mayweather' nemeses consisted of all dangerous fighters in their primes around his weight. He would not fight them, let's face it. The man can't even get a nod on an All Time list on any boxing forum I have visited. He was so afraid of someone taking his zero that he simply would not fight those with the best chances until they were over the hill or had already been KO'd, as in the case of Pacman. He is the single man who did the most to ruin boxing. He is TBE at ruining boxing.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post

            Where did the quote in your signature come from?
            It is often attributed to Napoleon, but who knows if it was actually him. It's been around for a long time

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
              Mayweather' nemeses consisted of all dangerous fighters in their primes around his weight. He would not fight them, let's face it. The man can't even get a nod on an All Time list on any boxing forum I have visited. He was so afraid of someone taking his zero that he simply would not fight those with the best chances until they were over the hill or had already been KO'd, as in the case of Pacman. He is the single man who did the most to ruin boxing. He is TBE at ruining boxing.
              Just to offer a second reason why the damn zero was so important . . . $$$$$$

              It's almost unfair to the fighter, fans, and the fight game, that one lousy night and they cut a zero off your next paycheck. One loss can come with way too much economic punishment.

              Once you make the big time, and feel you've proven yourself, and they are paying the really big bucks, it must be hard not to want to protect that zero, with everyone around you confirming you are making the right call.
              Last edited by Willie Pep 229; 03-09-2022, 07:39 PM.

              Comment


              • #57
                Usyk for Joshua could be added to this by year's end

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post

                  Just to offer a second reason why the damn zero was so important . . . $$$$$$

                  It's almost unfair to the fighter, fans, and the fight game, that one lousy night and they cut a zero off your next paycheck. One loss can come with way too much economic punishment.

                  Once you make the big time, and feel you've proven yourself, and they are paying the really big bucks, it must be hard not to want to protect that zero, with everyone around you confirming you are making the right call.
                  Yes, that is fine, and it is also understandable. Don't worry, he gets full credit for protecting his zero, just not for beating the best fighters when they were at their best. That's all. The man was the Meadowlark Lemon of boxing, an exhibition fighter at heart.

                  I don't have to prove any of this. Every boxing forum I have visited proves it for me. Despite all the money, he has a mundane legacy. It's humdrum, honey.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by markusmod View Post
                    Usyk for Joshua could be added to this by year's end
                    - - U talkin' Frankenstein?

                    usyk-wins.jpg?resize=600%2C400&ssl=1.jpg


                    Fwanky started strong, but couldn't finish by his end. Let's hope his end finishes with AJ and not the Rooskies. I don't wanna say Fwanky ducking AJ, but 'tis what it is 'tis.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

                      - - U talkin' Frankenstein?

                      usyk-wins.jpg?resize=600%2C400&ssl=1.jpg


                      Fwanky started strong, but couldn't finish by his end. Let's hope his end finishes with AJ and not the Rooskies. I don't wanna say Fwanky ducking AJ, but 'tis what it is 'tis.
                      Next time, he puts AJ to sleep

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP