Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Ring Rankings of 100 Best Boxers Introduced...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Ring Rankings of 100 Best Boxers Introduced...

    - - Or alternately Devil in the Details by Clifford Rold.

    Cuss it or muss it, puke it or duke it, here 'tis for Nascent Boxing Experts to chime in on as the countdown 10 at a time begins.

    https://www.ringtv.com/634216-to-be-...nkings-100-91/
    crold1 crold1 likes this.

  • #2
    Tarver over Toney and McCallum?
    mrbig1 mrbig1 likes this.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by just the facts View Post
      Tarver over Toney and McCallum?
      It's not a greatest fighters list. It's a study of Ring's rankings, carved into groupings, with points assessed on where opposition was ranked prior to a fight. In some cases, it means guys finish ahead of fighters they were better than (Sanchez behind Gomez, Barrera behind Hamed, McCallum behind Curry) but what I was trying to capture was performance in context of the moment. Even if it doesn't work for everyone, there are a lot of cool details throughout the study you may enjoy.

      Here's an explanation of what it is (and is not): https://www.ringtv.com/article/to-be-the-best-intro/

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by crold1 View Post

        It's not a greatest fighters list. It's a study of Ring's rankings, carved into groupings, with points assessed on where opposition was ranked prior to a fight. In some cases, it means guys finish ahead of fighters they were better than (Sanchez behind Gomez, Barrera behind Hamed, McCallum behind Curry) but what I was trying to capture was performance in context of the moment. Even if it doesn't work for everyone, there are a lot of cool details throughout the study you may enjoy.

        Here's an explanation of what it is (and is not): https://www.ringtv.com/article/to-be-the-best-intro/
        - - Well, Greb played out like I suspected as will Tunney and Dempsey being that as the earliest rankings, they were not ranked previously like the rest of modern fighters in full careers.

        Gonna personally compile the fighters for side by side numbers evaluation while ignoring the extraneous used to get these numbers that thus far seem splatter paint art to me.

        Overall Score Rank:

        Peak Score Rank:

        Win Total Rank:

        Comment


        • #5
          Do I have to buy a subscription to RingTV to read the full list?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
            Do I have to buy a subscription to RingTV to read the full list?
            No, Study findings are being dropped each day right now on their site.
            Willie Pep 229 Willie Pep 229 likes this.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
              Do I have to buy a subscription to RingTV to read the full list?
              https://www.ringtv.com/
              Willie Pep 229 Willie Pep 229 likes this.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
                Do I have to buy a subscription to RingTV to read the full list?
                - - No, but they'll sell you smart looking Superduty Collector Editions for your Ring Investment Portfolio.

                Comment


                • #9
                  - - Coming into the top 30 homestretch, and so who you got?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    - - A Ring reader has graciously provided a link examining racial demographics in Ring Rankings over the year.

                    https://dataverse.harvard.edu/datase...910/DVN/RYGQM6

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP