Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bridgerweight title ?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I'm waiting for a Super Bridgerweight title next. 224 lbs to 240 lbs.........

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Inter Beer View Post
      Why or what is a bridgerweight?? If there really is a need to provide a separate division for 'small heavyweights' (surely an oxymoron in its own right?), then why not simply go and put a weight limit on heavyweight and add on super heavyweight for the really massive dudes, say 238lbs plus. Anyway, after Usyk winning I think he has shown this division to be the pile of s##t it is alHow about 'extra superheavyweight' for Thor v Hall and any other fat boys out there? 320lbs plus. Any takers, WBC, WBA, WBO, IBF, IBO etc
      Oh yeah they already do that and it's actually called WWE.... lol
      Tradition! ( or just simple word assoication. )

      HW needs to remain the moniker for the biggest guy in the game. Create SHW and there is a chance that all the prestige normally associated with being HW Champion will be bestowed on a (smaller) lesser fighter. Better to let Tyson Fury's name be associated with Marciano, Dempsey, Louis, and Ali, then to let that association go to a lesser fighter simply because he weights less than 225.
      DeeMoney DeeMoney likes this.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post

        Tradition! ( or just simple word assoication. )

        HW needs to remain the moniker for the biggest guy in the game. Create SHW and there is a chance that all the prestige normally associated with being HW Champion will be bestowed on a (smaller) lesser fighter. Better to let Tyson Fury's name be associated with Marciano, Dempsey, Louis, and Ali, then to let that association go to a lesser fighter simply because he weights less than 225.
        I totally agree with you, boxing needs to retain the heavyweight champ at the top of the sport. I think the more obvious solution is to simply reset some of lower weight categories?
        There is an abundance of junior this and super that.

        Comment


        • #14
          We should boycott this ****.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Inter Beer View Post
            Why or what is a bridgerweight?? If there really is a need to provide a separate division for 'small heavyweights' (surely an oxymoron in its own right?), then why not simply go and put a weight limit on heavyweight and add on super heavyweight for the really massive dudes, say 238lbs plus. Anyway, after Usyk winning I think he has shown this division to be the pile of s##t it is already.
            How about 'extra superheavyweight' for Thor v Hall and any other fat boys out there? 320lbs plus. Any takers, WBC, WBA, WBO, IBF, IBO etc
            Oh yeah they already do that and it's actually called WWE.... lol
            So bitter. Likely a 90s HW fanboy. Douglas outboxed and knocked out Tyson, he would not be top 20 today! Nash out.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by LITTLE JOE View Post
              LOL ! The gap between Light heavyweight and heavyweight was too big hence the Cruiserweight division and now the gap is too big between smaller heavyweights and superheavyweights. Is that what this Bridgerweight title is ? Bring on the Bridgerweight division Oct. 22: Montreal (ESPN+)
              • Title fight: Oscar Rivas vs. Bryant Jennings, 12 rounds, for vacant WBC bridgerweight title
              The moron Sulaiman used Usyk's performance against Chisora as one of his big pointers to making bridgerweight. Bastard is eating crow now.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by markusmod View Post

                The moron Sulaiman used Usyk's performance against Chisora as one of his big pointers to making bridgerweight. Bastard is eating crow now.
                - -Grossly mistaken. Bridgette is a soft landing for the WBC Deyonce's dented noggin.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Nash out View Post

                  So bitter. Likely a 90s HW fanboy. Douglas outboxed and knocked out Tyson, he would not be top 20 today! Nash out.
                  Can't believe I have bitten but a) your post makes no sense in context of the thread, b) 90s heavy fan boy is hardly an insult if you also sat through the early 80s waiting for the division to come back to life. C) are you seriously saying Tyson would not be top 20 in today's ratings? D) you are clearly a thick tw@ who is irrelevant to me

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Inter Beer View Post

                    Can't believe I have bitten but a) your post makes no sense in context of the thread, b) 90s heavy fan boy is hardly an insult if you also sat through the early 80s waiting for the division to come back to life. C) are you seriously saying Tyson would not be top 20 in today's ratings? D) you are clearly a thick tw@ who is irrelevant to me
                    You have 57 posts on here. Nobody knows you or gives a f**k about you. Go back to your basement. Nash out.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Nash out View Post

                      You have 57 posts on here. Nobody knows you or gives a f**k about you. Go back to your basement. Nash out.
                      Yawn. Case closed. Confirmed my thoughts, you are a 100% to55er.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP