Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Willie Pep movie

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

    - -Might even see actual clips...
    From where, fantasy land? Not a single historian at the International boxing research organization has ever heard of there being film of that fight let alone seen it. Yet we're supposed to believe you, this forums biggest liar?
    Last edited by JAB5239; 09-24-2021, 09:04 PM.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

      From where, fantasy land? Not a single historian at the International boxing research organization has ever heard of there being film of that fight let alone seen it. Yet we're supposed to believe you, this forums biggest liar?
      I'll pay to see those clips. And then sell them to Pawn Stars!
      JAB5239 JAB5239 likes this.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

        From where, fantasy land? Not a single historian at the International boxing research organization has ever heard of there being film of that fight let alone seen it. Yet we're supposed to believe you, this forums biggest liar?
        - -Even an idiot like U could be a member of IBRO, not that I would damn them with such a dullard, but nice to see perhaps membership is goal U could obtain so as to legitimize U brand of stoopid...

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

          - -Even an idiot like U could be a member of IBRO, not that I would damn them with such a dullard, but nice to see perhaps membership is goal U could obtain so as to legitimize U brand of stoopid...
          The point isn't what you think of me, it's that no other historian there has even heard of there being film of that fight, and there are some very credible historians there as you already know. You never seem to have a problem using the IBRO when it suits your agenda, but after I emailed them and posted it here all of a sudden you try to mock it by saying anyone can be a member. And while that may be true (I wouldn't know) it doesn't change the fact you can search the internet and find NOTHING about any film of this fight, nor have ANY historians heard of there being any. But boxing scene's biggest liar claims to have seen it so we're supposed to believe you? I don't think so turd.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

            The point isn't what you think of me, it's that no other historian there has even heard of there being film of that fight, and there are some very credible historians there as you already know. You never seem to have a problem using the IBRO when it suits your agenda, but after I emailed them and posted it here all of a sudden you try to mock it by saying anyone can be a member. And while that may be true (I wouldn't know) it doesn't change the fact you can search the internet and find NOTHING about any film of this fight, nor have ANY historians heard of there being any. But boxing scene's biggest liar claims to have seen it so we're supposed to believe you? I don't think so turd.
            - -I use IBRO as a relevant reference point to Ring and Boxrec rankings, no more, no less, and U ignorance don't have to believe squat.

            Nobody knew the Langford/Jeannette Paris heavy title fight existed on film until it turned up over 100 years later. Nor did they know Burns had lasted the distance against Jack Johnson until they figured out the rounds were out of sequence.

            We all know how stoooopid U is, so no revelations to change that looming on the horizon.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

              - -I use IBRO as a relevant reference point to Ring and Boxrec rankings, no more, no less, and U ignorance don't have to believe squat.

              Nobody knew the Langford/Jeannette Paris heavy title fight existed on film until it turned up over 100 years later. Nor did they know Burns had lasted the distance against Jack Johnson until they figured out the rounds were out of sequence.

              We all know how stoooopid U is, so no revelations to change that looming on the horizon.
              Nobody knew, nobody knew!!! Blah, blah, blah!! Nobody still hasn't seen film of the Robinson-Pep amateur fight because there isn't any. Just like there isn't a list of your 17 heavyweights better than Holmes and Holyfield.. You talk so much **** and never back it up. You are a liar and NOONE will disagree with me about that!! Funny you can't find a damn thing on the internet about it, don't you think? Tell us again how Lance Armstrong broke his should and got back on his bike to win a bronze medal. Oh that's right, I supplied a link that showed be broke his collar bone and was carted away by ambulance. How about Tyson being on several different "experimental" drugs! Zoloft. The list goes on and on. You never offer proof, just your word which has been proven repeatedly to be no good.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

                - -I use IBRO as a relevant reference point to Ring and Boxrec rankings, no more, no less, and U ignorance don't have to believe squat.

                Nobody knew the Langford/Jeannette Paris heavy title fight existed on film until it turned up over 100 years later. Nor did they know Burns had lasted the distance against Jack Johnson until they figured out the rounds were out of sequence.

                We all know how stoooopid U is, so no revelations to change that looming on the horizon.
                What are you referring to? Yes, technically the fight was a PTS victory for Johnson, as rendered by the referee because the agreement called for a 'decision' if the police halted the fight premature (which they did becuse Burns was on his feet at the time.)

                But I don't get how that changed based on a new juxtaposition of the film's rounds?


                POLICE: I wonder if at that time the referee had the power to stop the fight?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

                  Nobody knew, nobody knew!!! Blah, blah, blah!! Nobody still hasn't seen film of the Robinson-Pep amateur fight because there isn't any. Just like there isn't a list of your 17 heavyweights better than Holmes and Holyfield.. You talk so much **** and never back it up. You are a liar and NOONE will disagree with me about that!! Funny you can't find a damn thing on the internet about it, don't you think? Tell us again how Lance Armstrong broke his should and got back on his bike to win a bronze medal. Oh that's right, I supplied a link that showed be broke his collar bone and was carted away by ambulance. How about Tyson being on several different "experimental" drugs! Zoloft. The list goes on and on. You never offer proof, just your word which has been proven repeatedly to be no good.
                  - -I don't throw pearls before swine, a proven 2000 year old proverb...

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post

                    What are you referring to? Yes, technically the fight was a PTS victory for Johnson, as rendered by the referee because the agreement called for a 'decision' if the police halted the fight premature (which they did becuse Burns was on his feet at the time.)

                    But I don't get how that changed based on a new juxtaposition of the film's rounds?


                    POLICE: I wonder if at that time the referee had the power to stop the fight?
                    - -It was listed forever on boxrec as a KO, and in fact Houdini boxing expert would break it down for us, the mere plebes in the day.

                    Dunno if he was banned or shamed, but he came back as a he/she/it with the same signature leading with face first style.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

                      - -A bunch more than are accessible by youtube.
                      yawn... you are an idiot

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP