Probably Ketchel for me.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Most Overrated ''Old School Fighter''?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Ascended View PostLouis/srr both are talked of as if they could beat way more advanced fighters in the 70s-'90s, yet never even faced guys as advanced in those eras's even on an amateur level, very odd they are spoken of so highly that way
So, new troll name, same old minority story.
Don't let anyone hold your feet to the fire, asking tough questions like "If 70s-90s fighters are way more advanced than 40's-60's fighters; doesn't it also hold that 00's-20's fighters are equally way more advanced than 70s-90's fighters as well? If not, why not?".
Challenges like that can't be turned back with responses like "Just watch the films you crazy idiots", because when I do, I see the 1920s-1950s fighters showing the best ability....by far.
Boxing's been a headline pro sport for much longer than todays team sports have been, so there's no point in using the advancement of those sports to support your theory.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
.
https://********/PdWT3y6DH4w?si=bRzPNBP6J9RehMht
https://********/BsQdawAbm4Y?si=bldMwmhYV0fcLjr2
https://********/qt_lt8biA4Y?si=4KSnbTnAgDmJdheR
https://********/XnUOU5RF28Y?si=LGx-l25ohli2JYBF
https://********/5VLWBVpL23k?si=Db2YTutPLsANFSQV
https://********/ODDdNiUv8ek?si=Qa61Cbk60gu15Ydv
https://********/ibJLyAm2enY?si=x6UW-7MEOOx7CeUG
https://********/UVVz4kBYqs8?si=thpKIHXP3cv4Csf0
https://********/KZ28kqssABg?si=CZO6p2LxDZHMGci6
https://********/ouWzidCxjPM?si=AfUgsvrG8R7d2klL
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ascended View PostLouis/srr both are talked of as if they could beat way more advanced fighters in the 70s-'90s, yet never even faced guys as advanced in those eras's even on an amateur level, very odd they are spoken of so highly that wayWillow The Wisp
cfang like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willow The Wisp View Post.
https://********/PdWT3y6DH4w?si=bRzPNBP6J9RehMht
https://********/BsQdawAbm4Y?si=bldMwmhYV0fcLjr2
https://********/qt_lt8biA4Y?si=4KSnbTnAgDmJdheR
https://********/XnUOU5RF28Y?si=LGx-l25ohli2JYBF
https://********/5VLWBVpL23k?si=Db2YTutPLsANFSQV
https://********/ODDdNiUv8ek?si=Qa61Cbk60gu15Ydv
https://********/ibJLyAm2enY?si=x6UW-7MEOOx7CeUG
https://********/UVVz4kBYqs8?si=thpKIHXP3cv4Csf0
https://********/KZ28kqssABg?si=CZO6p2LxDZHMGci6
https://********/ouWzidCxjPM?si=AfUgsvrG8R7d2klL
Last edited by Ascended; 02-12-2024, 04:38 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willow The Wisp View Post
When I saw this old thread, I knew who bumped it.
So, new troll name and, the same old minority story.
Don't let anyone hold your feet to the fire, asking tough questions like "If 70s-90s fighters are way more advanced than 40's-60's fighters; doesn't it also hold that 00's-20's fighters are equally way more advanced than 70s-90's fighters as well? If not, why not?".
Challenges like that can't be turned back with responses like "Just watch the films you crazy idiots", because when I do, I see the 1920s-1950s fighters showing the best ability....by far.
Boxing's been a headline pro sport for much longer than today's sports have been, so there's no point in using the advancement of those sports to support your theory.
Early 00 is 2000-2004-5 and fighters advanced again 10 year a after that and then 10 years from That I can see differences with each of these eras which is why I'm always right
it’s a very big difference it’s not up to me to fix you’re vision I can see advances and others who have good vision can too that’s all I care about
how am I a troll when you’re the lunatic, not I you guys are hurt by what I say I’m not hurt by what you lunatics say you’re hurt i say and show the truthLast edited by Ascended; 02-12-2024, 04:48 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by winky44 View PostWho is it??????????Marchegiano likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by them_apples View Post
Jack Dempsey, not that heâs a bad fighter, but Iâd pick many other heavyweight greats over himthem_apples likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment