Why is Jack Johnson rated so high...

[Willie Pep 229]

Go read my first post in your thread, dumbo



Maybe you lost the link? Here it is https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/b...ducked-dempsey

Told you once tell you again . . . New theory.

Wills ducked Dempsey . . . If/when Wills loses to Dempsey he no longer had any political value.

Wills was was Farley's 'Negro vote' getter. So long as they could play him as a color line victim.

That was what it was all about.

The opportunity was there so why did Mullins refuse to sign?

[QueensburyRules]

Ok, I read it all. And let me just say that yes, you have embarrassed yourself yet again!

- - Which one is U?

[travestyny]

Told you once tell you again . . . New theory.

Wills ducked Dempsey . . . If/when Wills loses to Dempsey he no longer had any political value.

Wills was was Farley's 'Negro vote' getter. So long as they could play him as a color line victim.

That was what it was all about.

The opportunity was there so why did Mullins refuse to sign?

Are you slow or what?


Mullins signed it, fool. Stop embarrassing yourself.

[Willie Pep 229]

Are you slow or what?


Mullins signed it, fool. Stop embarrassing yourself.

No he didn't. There were three different negotiations and events.

[travestyny]

No he didn't. There were three different negotiations and events.

Yes. He did.

Feel free to keep embarrassing yourself. You're just going to feel more ****** in the end.



It's the same dumb shlt you tried before and I told you he signed it. Then you pretended that you were just joking. Now apparently you forgot and you're trying the same desperate dumb shlt

I told you to go read your old thread. Apparently you have difficulty reading, which is why you couldn't understand that article about Jeffries.



All of that foolishness you just wrote about your "new theory." LMAO. Another epic fail. You should really stop posting after this. You are done.

[travestyny]

Tammany and his manger Mullins realized that Wills on his best day couldn't beat Dempsey.

Why else would a manager refuse to sign those papers mentioned in my post you made avaible?

Wills was the one actually doing the ducking.

Why did Mullins refuse to grab the fight when it was there? Why did Mullins refuse to sign?

Wills was actually ducking Dempsey.

This is great work, Willie. Let's use your logic and make sure you don't change it up, shall we?

Using your logic, Kearns and Rickard didn't believe Dempsey could beat Wills, since they didn't want the fight.


But your conclusion doesn't absolve Wills and say it was Mullins fault, like you always try to do for Dempsey. Oh no. What does it say? That WILLS was ducking Dempsey.


Congratulations! Now that we know Mullins actually did sign, let's not be hypocritical. Let's play it even stevens.

Kearns and Rickard didn't have faith in Dempsey winning according to your logic. And what is the final conclusion according to YOUR logic?


Dempsey was actually ducking Wills.

Unless you can explain the double standard, you are done for!

Thanks. I knew you would come around. You ****ed up, dummy

[Willie Pep 229]

Yes. He did.

Feel free to keep embarrassing yourself. You're just going to feel more ****** in the end.



It's the same dumb shlt you tried before and I told you he signed it. Then you pretended that you were just joking. Now apparently you forgot and you're trying the same desperate dumb shlt

I told you to go read your old thread. Apparently you have difficulty reading, which is why you couldn't understand that article about Jeffries.



All of that foolishness you just wrote about your "new theory." LMAO. Another epic fail. You should really stop posting after this. You are done.

Show me the contracts he signed. I say he didn't. You just can't deal with the fact the Wills' people really didn't want to fight Dempsey. So long as he stayed a color line victim he was a cash cow. Koed once by a top white fighter he was of no value. Better to pretend he wanted the fight then to actually fight.

You should try proving your point instead of calling me names. But the is your MO when you got nothing which is most of the time you just start insulting people. So I am sure once again you got nothing but air.

You can't prove for a second that Wills actually wanted the fight. It deeply bothers you to be so exposed. Mullins walked out of several meetings without signing. Why is that?

[Willie Pep 229]

This is great work, Willie. Let's use your logic and make sure you don't change it up, shall we?

Using your logic, Kearns and Rickard didn't believe Dempsey could beat Wills, since they didn't want the fight.


But your conclusion doesn't absolve Wills and say it was Mullins fault, like you always try to do for Dempsey. Oh no. What does it say? That WILLS was ducking Dempsey.


Congratulations! Now that we know Mullins actually did sign, let's not be hypocritical. Let's play it even stevens.

Kearns and Rickard didn't have faith in Dempsey winning according to your logic. And what is the final conclusion according to YOUR logic?


Dempsey was actually ducking Wills.

Unless you can explain the double standard, you are done for!

Thanks. I knew you would come around. You ****ed up, dummy

You're delusional.

[travestyny]

Show me the contracts he signed. I say he didn't. You just can't deal with the fact the Wills' people really didn't want to fight Dempsey. So long as he stayed a color line victim he was a cash cow. Koed once by a top white fighter he was of no value. Better to pretend he wanted the fight then to actually fight.

You should try proving your point instead of calling me names. But the is your MO when you got nothing which is most of the time you just start insulting people. So I am sure once again you got nothing but air.

You can't prove for a second that Wills actually wanted the fight. It deeply bothers you to be so exposed. Mullins walked out of several meetings without signing. Why is that?

I've already proved this once. But for you, it's no problem to prove it again.


Can you confirm the date of the contract you are mentioning. I don't want you trying to bail out. Your link in the other thread no longer works but I can clearly see the date on the link. Just be a good lad and confirm it for me so you don't try to sneak out of this. Thanks.



You're really going to be exposed for the clown you are. Get ready

[Willie Pep 229]

I've already proved this once. But for you, it's no problem to prove it again.


Can you confirm the date of the contract you are mentioning. I don't want you trying to bail out. Your link in the other thread no longer works but I can clearly see the date on the link. Just be a good lad and confirm it for me so you don't try to sneak out of this. Thanks.



You're really going to be exposed for the clown you are. Get ready

OK should me three contracts from 1922 signed by Mullins.