Originally posted by jackal56
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Marciano was overrated and not an ATG.
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostGreatness is not struggling to beat a few overhyped washed up old men.
Poet
Comment
-
I'm not white or from Spain. I never said anything about his skin colour in relation to his fighting. I said the media overrate him because of it. He couldn't beat Ali or Holmes and if you think he could you beensmoking dope. HE struggled V old men and was too easy to hi. He fought nobody good in their prime so is not a great. He didn't even dominate the old men! And he was helped against Archie Moore who was not a heavyweight like you had in 70s. Neither was Charles or Walcott. You fail to explain why and how you think Marciano could havng in their with the best of the 70's. He was just a great white hype, which is a fact! He had no skills and hs style was ****. He was too small, too slow and simply not good enough compared to any other genuine heavy's. You just want to lick his balls because you think it tastes like pasta.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostI'm not white or from Spain.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostI never said anything about his skin colour in relation to his fighting. I said the media overrate him because of it.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostHe couldn't beat Ali or Holmes and if you think he could you beensmoking dope.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostHE struggled V old men and was too easy to hi. He fought nobody good in their prime so is not a great.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostHe didn't even dominate the old men!.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostAnd he was helped against Archie Moore!
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View Postwho was not a heavyweight like you had in 70s. Neither was Charles or Walcott.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostYou fail to explain why and how you think Marciano could havng [sic] in their with the best of the 70's.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostHe was just a great white hype, which is a fact!
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostHe had no skills and hs [sic] style was ****.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostHe was too small, too slow and simply not good enough compared to any other genuine heavy's.
Real simple: If your weight is NOT out of line with the average weight of the Heavyweights of your era then you are a "genuine" Heavy.
Originally posted by JulioCesaChavez View PostYou just want to lick his balls because you think it tastes like pasta.
PoetLast edited by StarshipTrooper; 11-12-2008, 11:30 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rafael Benitez View PostMarciano was overrated. If he fought Liston isntead of being a chicken he would have bean beaten to a pulp. He struggled against slow old men like Walcott and a washed up Charles. I reckon most top heavies from each era would have wiped the floor with him. Do u really think he could stand in there with Big Klitchko, Lewis, Holyfied or even Samuel Peter?LOL. Way too easy to hit. He was lucky that Italians loved boxing at the time, it was number one in sports and he had no competition.
Only idiots who have no fight dvd's (i have 1000+ 500vhs) and haven't seen much would rate 'the rock'. The best of his era were old men, and even then he was getting outboxed by the painfully slow Jersey Joe Walcott (equivalent to a journeyman like glen johnson)just by looking at footage one can see he wouldn't stand a chance aginst a Prime Roy Jones, the old Hopkins or even our Clinton Woods! Never mind any genuine heavyweight. He didn't lose coz he didn't fight anybody. Look at all the best, they lost coz they fought the best. He knew he had to retire early or get ko'd by the up and coming fighters! Smart guy but still rubbish.
I've seen every major boxing match that took place in the past 100 years and every Marciano title fight. Walcott was an old slow man and even then he had to hit the man when he was down because he was being outboxed. Marciano is overrated because he was the white hope in a segragated America where they believed they were evolutionarily superior. Marciano never beat anybody decent in their prime and was lucky he was in a dead era. The truth is he was overrated and would lose to many of todays light heavyweights including Calzaghe Hopkins and maybe even Tarver. People who know boxing know he is not a top ten heavyweight. Don't get upset, it is the truth.
LOL some Marciano advocates believe Joe Louis was not totally over the hill when Marciano fought him!!! He was pulled out of retirment and looked more washed up than the shores of Blackpool. Just because Rocky was crap and made a meal out of him and the other old men he fought doesn't mean they were not washed up. Also he did not fight everyone around at his time and retired early to avoid the likes of Sonny liston, Cleveland Williams etc. Even so, it may not be his fault but still exposed his weaknesses. He struggled with Walcott who was average, slow and ever so OLD. It took a dirty shot and there was never to be a rematch in segregated america that needed their hero so bad. He was so easy to hit it was a joke. Completely outboxed for many rouns. Marciano would lose to David Haye in about 2 rounds.
I think he is not even in the top 20 in the heavyweight division of all time. It pisses me off when people think he was in the top 5 or even the best! ROFL. Why does he always pop up on p4p lists? He was absolutely ****!
Comment
-
Marciano could knock out the thread starter and the people hating on him.
Plus he was Italian, so his **** was probably huge. So everyone here who dislikes him loses bad. ='[
Comment
-
Originally posted by Allucard View PostWhat really makes people mad, as it did in the case of Marciano is fighters like these and specially their fans and associated media not only claiming they were good but going to say to say they are All Time Greats! That's very offensive to the likes of Ali, Sugar Ray Robbinson, Foreman who really accomplished major features, moved up, conquered the world and in some cases came back to do it again (Ali, Foreman)! That's an ATG in my book.
Not even Mayweather went as far as to saying he was an ATG and his record puts Joe Calzaghe's to shame!
Why do all white fighters who finish their careers undefeated have huge bandwagons making a case for ATG status?
There are a few legit white ATG fighters like Tunney and Dempsy who not only were among the very first fighters to ever lace them up, but had astonishing numbers of fights and managed to win even with poor diet/preparation/fight notice.
Comment
-
Why do all white fighters who finish their careers undefeated have huge bandwagons making a case for ATG status?Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostWho are "ALL" these white fighters who retired undefeated with huge bandwagons?Not even Mayweather went as far as to saying he was an ATG and his record puts Joe Calzaghe's to shame!Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostMayweather once claimed he was better than Ray Robinson.
It's a big deal to some people.
Comment
-
Comment