Mike Tyson vs Rocky Marciano

[Hawkins]

OK Tyson hits Marciano, Marciano goes down.LOL It's that simple. I've already stated that Marciano wasn't superman or ******. He would have moved back away from Tyson after he felt his power early. That would have put Marciano at a complete disadvantage because he didn't know how to fight backing up. Once Mike took Marciano to the ropes, Marciano would be And that concludes my analysis. LOL

Ok, how many times have you seen Marciano back up from anyone??

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

Ok, how many times have you seen Marciano back up from anyone??

I say that because he would be in there against the greatest knockout artist and inside fighter in heavyweight history.

[Brockton Lip]

I say that because he would be in there against the greatest knockout artist and inside fighter in heavyweight history.

I'd say hes not the greatest KO artist and hes certainly not the greatest heavyweight inside fighter, as I had stated earlier. Marciano for example was a better inside fighter.

[Jim Jeffries]

I say that because he would be in there against the greatest knockout artist and inside fighter in heavyweight history.

Actually the Heavyweight champ with the highest KO percentage is Vitali Klitschko. Even David Tua has a higher KO percentage than Tyson. Tyson was the greatest elbower, headbutter, low blower and biter in history though.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

I'd say hes not the greatest KO artist and hes certainly not the greatest heavyweight inside fighter, as I had stated earlier. Marciano for example was a better inside fighter.

Marciano never landed anything like a quick right hand to the body fallowed by another right uppercut in a split second. Just that move alone holds Tyson as a better inside fighter than Marciano. Not to mention Tysons greater speed and power. I'm sure you don't see it that way, just my opinion.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

Actually the Heavyweight champ with the highest KO percentage is Vitali Klitschko. Even David Tua has a higher KO percentage than Tyson. Tyson was the greatest elbower, headbutter, low blower and biter in history though.

Like I've said on other threads, you play way too much into stats young man. LOL

[Hawkins]

Marciano never landed anything like a quick right hand to the body fallowed by another right uppercut in a split second. Just that move alone holds Tyson as a better inside fighter than Marciano. Not to mention Tysons greater speed and power. I'm sure you don't see it that way, just my opinion.

I think Tyson was a very good infighter with those lighting combinations. I just don't think he liked it when someone gave it right back and smothered him.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

I think Tyson was a very good infighter with those lighting combinations. I just don't think he liked it when someone gave it right back and smothered him.

Like I said before my cut off point falls far before yours, but while Tyson was "right" he did have a few guys try to fight inside on him and he looked good doing it. Holyfield and Douglas didn't fight inside on him so it leaves me to wonder what fights your talking about.

[Hawkins]

Like I said before my cut off point falls far before yours, but while Tyson was "right" he did have a few guys try to fight inside on him and he looked good doing it. Holyfield and Douglas didn't fight inside on him so it leaves me to wonder what fights your talking about.

What?? Holyfield didn't fight inside on Tyson?? Did I hear you correctly?? Oh I see you must be referrencing the Tyson-Holyfield fight of '91 eh? If so I agree.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

What?? Holyfield didn't fight inside on Tyson?? Did I hear you correctly?? Oh I see you must be referrencing the Tyson-Holyfield fight of '91 eh? If so I agree.

Oh sorry great one.LOL I was looking at it entirely, yes Holyfield did some inside fighting and some wasn't.