Gans is considered to this very day top 3 at lightweight. By experts. That’s not you.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you consider Joe Gans as the Greatest Lightweight of All Times???
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by billeau2 View PostIll do you one better: ON ANY of your extraordinary claims... Cite one source that can support your point of view. And you calling someone grandiose? Come on man... You can't be serious. But ok fine... lets remember that extra ordinary claims require extra ordinary proof... and having one, or two such claims is charming... But when most of the claims are of this sort? Your probably wrong.
You used to be a teacher... I would imagine you were probably a good teacher... I mean Im only going on profiling but there is nothing better for students than someone who challenges their ideas, who engages them... And without scaring them away makes them think... But think for a moment how you would treat a student who told you something like.... "Grant was a military Genius and Lee was an overrated washout." And when someone raised an eyebrow they were told, "your just dumb and parroting what others say." and furthermore, no proof... just a statement.
How would that go down in your class? Dude I am trying...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HOUDINI563 View PostGans is considered to this very day top 3 at lightweight. .
To be Top 3 that means no more than 2 others can be better than you.
Seeing as how McFarland, Canzoneri, Welsh, Tendler, McLarnin, Armstrong, Ambers, Angott, Williams, Ortiz, Buchanan, Arguello, Chavez, Whitaker, Mayweather and Loma are all better than Gans, he ranks below them. That's 16 fighters, and maybe there are more, who already are closer to the top spot than Gans is. You see, 16 is a bigger number than 3.
The number you were looking for is TWENTY. That's the number you'll get if you can't each of your fingers twice.
But hey! At least you were using numbers. Br than letters, colors and shapes like you were using before for ordinals.
Comment
-
Here is your chance loser. Please post all the expert opinions who rate ALL those 16 fighters over Joe Gans.
Let’s see what you got loser.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View PostWell, there's nothing irregular about either man's performance; not based on the footage, not based on their records. Gans and McGovern both behaved as normal. Gans had lost to lesser men. McGovern had beaten at least one better man.
The argument made for a fix wouldn't hold up in court. Hell, you'd be lucky for it to even suffice opening a case.
And no, McGovern never beat another fighter ad good as Gans. But I'd like to hear who you think that fighter might be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View PostI know this might go over your head, but i'll give it a shot...
To be Top 3 that means no more than 2 others can be better than you.
Seeing as how McFarland, Canzoneri, Welsh, Tendler, McLarnin, Armstrong, Ambers, Angott, Williams, Ortiz, Buchanan, Arguello, Chavez, Whitaker, Mayweather and Loma are all better than Gans, he ranks below them. That's 16 fighters, and maybe there are more, who already are closer to the top spot than Gans is. You see, 16 is a bigger number than 3.
The number you were looking for is TWENTY. That's the number you'll get if you can't each of your fingers twice.
But hey! At least you were using numbers. Br than letters, colors and shapes like you were using before for ordinals.
Comment
Comment