Joe Louis, greatest heavyweight of all time?

[brownpimp88]

And Holmes while fighting ofen still got exposed by a lightheavyweight as well.

Winning 7 rounds means you got exposed, haha. At least he won a round, something dempsey couldnt do.

Harry wills should have been awarded the belt while dempsey was busy getting laid. Harry Wills will be dempsey's version of darius michalczewski, the guy he never fought but was expected to.

[Verstyle]

whos joe louis

[butterfly1964]

Winning 7 rounds means you got exposed, haha. At least he won a round, something dempsey couldnt do.

Harry wills should have been awarded the belt while dempsey was busy getting laid. Harry Wills will be dempsey's version of darius michalczewski, the guy he never fought but was expected to.

I see your another Roy Jones hater, huh?

Anyway, Holmes was active as still lost, Demspey was not. Plus Tunney is better than Spinks at heavyweight.

[brownpimp88]

I see your another Roy Jones hater, huh?

Anyway, Holmes was active as still lost, Demspey was not. Plus Tunney is better than Spinks at heavyweight.

I'm a roy jones nuthugger, by the way how is tunney better at heavyweight. This is ridiculous, spinks beat cooney while tunney fought a bum and retired. Michael spinks is one of my favourites, hes ****in awesome. If he isnt in your top 5 at 175, its a joke.

[butterfly1964]

I'm a roy jones nuthugger, by the way how is tunney better at heavyweight. This is ridiculous, spinks beat cooney while tunney fought a bum and retired. Michael spinks is one of my favourites, hes ****in awesome. If he isnt in your top 5 at 175, its a joke.

Spinks is better at 175, but Tunney is better at heavyweight. Cooney was nothing but a media-hype. A great white joke. So that means nothing. Tunney would be more succesful against heavyweights than Spinks would. What did Spinks do? He beat an old Holmes, then got a gift decision from Holmes and then beat an inactive and overrated Gerry Cooney, and then got obliterated by Tyson. Tunney was faster of hand and foot than Spinks and could take heavyweight punches better than Spinks.

[brownpimp88]

Spinks is better at 175, but Tunney is better at heavyweight. Cooney was nothing but a media-hype. A great white joke. So that means nothing. Tunney would be more succesful against heavyweights than Spinks would. What did Spinks do? He beat an old Holmes, then got a gift decision from Holmes and then beat an inactive and overrated Gerry Cooney, and then got obliterated by Tyson. Tunney was faster of hand and foot than Spinks and could take heavyweight punches better than Spinks.

What did he do? He became linear champ, which is huge if you are a 175er. Im postive that from 1985-1987 he was top 5 pound for pound. Gerry cooney is a great win to ad to ur resume, better than that bum tunney fought before he retired.

[butterfly1964]

What did he do? He became linear champ, which is huge if you are a 175er. Im postive that from 1985-1987 he was top 5 pound for pound. Gerry cooney is a great win to ad to ur resume, better than that bum tunney fought before he retired.

What makes him a bum? The fact that you know little about him? That just means your stupified when it comes to boxing history.

[brownpimp88]

What makes him a bum? The fact that you know little about him? That just means your stupified when it comes to boxing history.

he aint better than cooney

[joelouisbarrow]

yes...man i love these easy answers

[ceboxer15]

Its like 56 of the greatest heavyweights of all time. I have this computer program that calulates the fights. I write the interviews, and ect. Then post the fights on the blog. After this I really want to write a pound for pound tournament! Not use the program just type out the fights.

sounds good, what program is it? I also have a computer program that can simulate fights, mine is Title Bout Championship Boxing 2. I would like to check out your tournament, where can I see it?