Thank you. All we need is a nice, somewhat clearer explanation of what you actually intend to say. It's often hard to communicate with you because IMO you write a bunch of stuff without thinking of how your message will be perceived by others. You WERE the, "ALL OF THE MEXICAN FIGHTERS ARE CHIKEN GAYS BWAHAHAHAHA" guy not so long ago. All I have to say is THINK before you post, you may hear back from people who ill-receive your post if you don't. But maybe you don't care I dunno.
As for Morales using dirty tactics...well of course he's capable of fouling Manny, but Manny is also capable of fouling Morales. Basically what you did in your original post was simply speculate. But you are throwing out random situations without evidence. And that "Morales used elbows against Chi" example is tired and overexaggerated. You have to be insanely paranoid to believe that the judges were out get Manny in the Marquez fight or that they'll wrong him on March 19th.
You have an opinion and that's fine. But you are spewing out random shit without being objective. You are generalizing when you say, "Morales' countrymen used dirty tactics when they were in trouble (JMM, Barrera) so why is it impossible for Morales to do so?" Not every Mexican fighter is the same...sure its possible for Morales to foul Pacquiao, but no more than the converse. Give Morales a fair shake and people will respect your opinion more.
That entire last sentence you typed was just part of the bullshit that makes it hard for people to communicate with you. That, "I hope this is reachable blah blah blah" BS makes that entire quality post you just made worthless. I never insulted your intelligence directly, although I could have. I stated that your english was not very good...it was hard for me to understand because some of the wording looked like a person with a severe case of dyslexia wrote it. I understand that you are a pretty intelligent guy when not discussing certain aspects of Pacquiao. I guess i'll just have to take what you say at face value from now on and not read into your posts for deeper meaning. :cool:
oh, i can see that you havent got it over with with the "ALL OF THE MEXICAN FIGHTERS ARE CHIKEN GAYS BWAHAHAHAHA," thing. i thought i have cleared that before already. but since i can see that you're the type who demands clearer explanation, it'll be no prblem for me to take time for it. ok, now i want you to pay attention very carefuly and try not to misinterpret this.
the reason why i and some Pac fans said such things is simply to make noise hoping it would reach the fighters so that they'll insist on proving themselves (which EM had just done) that the Pac fans we're wrong, and he's not such kind of fighter. and i believe it was effective dont you think? EM was suppose to be moving up in weight atfer his fight with MAB as he promised. but look where he is now. and you can also see that it was being effective when EM always tried to tell the media men that he wants Pacman thus showing that he aint scared of him and he aint avoiding him, coz he was facing MAB. another reason why such comment was made is to also show how fans would tend to react or think when promoters promises a fight with Pacman then suddenly leaves him out in the cold by taking other fight than what was agreed by principle (i hope you're updated with that case). this is how fans can show power, by making themselves heared. you create issues that will put pressure on the concerned party. but guys like you have taken it seriously and too shallow that it seem to haunt you even in your sleep. well, am sorry for that. i can understand that not all can dig the obvious reasons behind such comments. maybe i should be the one saying THINK or ASK (politely) before reacting. but i do hope its clear on you now.
as for EM-Pac fouling, that's exactly what i meant. but why i said it'll be EM? simple, fighters like them usually use this only when they can see that fighting their opponent fairly is not enough to distract him. again, IMO it might be EM who'll be on that part. and you can say that its gonna be Pac if you do think that Pac will be out hassled (which i doubt). its just an oppinion, no big deal. and its not just speculation, how can you say that when you actually agreed to me that EM himself is capable of doing it? dont you think you contradicted your own accusation?
with regards to being paranoid on Pac being wronged on March 19. how could you say that? didnt i just made it clear on the other post why i thought so? again, if you realy know boxing, you know that these happened many times and it happened to Pacman when he faught JMM and it was in MGM Grand Las Vegas and worse, its both under Bob Arum's influence. its business my friend. a business man like Arum will do ANYTHING and i mean ANYTHING to win. that is ofcourse if Pac fails to KO EM. now again let me ask you is it not possible to happen? if you'd believe that it could, how then can you say am being paranoid of that? in these case you seemed to be the one spewing out random shit without being objective.
about generalizing Morales' countrymen using dirty tactics when they were in trouble, am just trying to narrow it down to the persons (JMM and MAB) involved with Pacman. but if you're going to carefuly understand it, i think again i have made it clear that all fighters are capable of doing so but that doesnt meant am not giving EM a fair shake. again, you're accusing me of how you think it is. that's just too shallow.
as for some people having trouble communicating with me by insulting their intelligence. maybe wanna take another glance read your last part of your post and maybe you wanna look into the mirror and say it again to me. besides, if you'll look back on the posts in this thread, you'll see who started giving oppinions and who started talking bullshit! now if you want iit to be cool just say it cool and quit using terms that wont justify your intention of getting cool. COOL! :D