I think thats a bit unfair, i think some of the guys he was fighting were good fighters. Braithweight (spelling) was an ex champ and looked great at one point in his carear, even mark hobson was a good fighter
and he tried to make fights with the likes of jonny nelson
Mitchell is a Frank Warren fighter and he put him with johanson, that was a 50-50 fight. Cracking entertainment by the way, my favourite fight this year
"Olieviera, Vilches, Stewart, Tackio, Rios..... when you have a guy like witter who is holding a title"
witter didnt have a world title when hatton was fightin those fights
how can you call hatton a ducker, he has fought 2 men who people have considered the best pound for pound fighters in the world at that time, his last 6 or so fights have been for world titles.
isnt a ducker somebody who avoids fights?
This is the first time in both of their carears that witter would be a decent fight for hatton, he has always been a step back in the past
havin said that - there is still better fights for hatton if he wants to remain on the world stage. for the most part witters fights are boring
look at the marcus decorley (spelling) fight, that was a very rubbish and boring fight
why would hatton be duckin witter?
this video was taken a long time ago before he fought, tzu and mayweather to name but 2, doesnt sound like someone who avoids fighters
its never really happened so far because witter has never really been someone who would be a step in the right direction for ricky, if he had thought and beaten him at the time of this video how much would he have gained?
each fight has been a step in the right direction for him and that why he is now one of the best known boxers in the world
robberies
about the biggest 4 robberies of all time have been in fights involving sven ottke.
you can pick on fights such has hatton collazo where hatton definately lost although there is a case for him winning and the judges gave it to him for being the aggressor but the ottke clearly lost on several occasions and yet retained his belt 10 times or there abouts.
and it doesnt matter whether witter is in his prime or not, if witter offers the kind of carear success for hatton as tzu, maussa, callazo, urangu, castillo and mayweather have (soz about the spellings) im sure he'll fight him
camymcf - perhaps hatton hasnt looked quite as good as witter recently but remember the massive difference in class he has been fighting at
Boxa Ali, you say you dont like his style? well what sort of boxing do you like, Calzaghe throws lots and lots of punches every round and most hit the target, he isnt affraid to get hit either and is often in a brawl, its doesnt get much more exciting, what else do you want?
and someone said he talks too much and you dont like what he says, have you ever heard hopkins speak? do you preffer what he goes on about?
i really enjoyed the first fight and thought it was a top quality knockout
i think taylor will find it difficult to fight his own fight this time worrying about the big right hand
Pavlik by KO again, probably earlier than the last
what do you think?
mayweather deserves a good slagging, he is irritating and has said a lot worse things to every boxer he has ever faced, are you really that offended by it
it wasnt all untrue anyway, floyd aint the most entertaining boxer, he punches and runs which doesnt make for a good fight
you think hatton is a jerk for calling out mayweather?
how much money did he make out of it? in what way was he a jerk?
and right now is the first time that witter would be a decent fight for hatton, in the past he just hasnt had the stock, why would he fight him? he hasnt become one of the top fighters in the world by taking steps backward
u actually believe that in the hatton maywheather build up it was hatton that was the jerk?
i cant believe someone would say that, mayweather is a fool, his trash talk is stupid and makes him look like a dick
ok he battered hatton, he is the better boxer, but he is also the biggest fool