Can someone plz tell me why Marquez's name gets used in the same sentence as Manny Pacquiao's??? If it wasn't for the mistake a judge made in the first fight (10-7 should have been 10-6 in the first round) PacMan would have 2 wins under his belt over him. Do these so called boxing experts not recall Marquez getting knocked on his ass 3 times in the first fight and once in the rematch??? That's four knockdowns vs. none on Pacquiao in 2 fights. So PacMAn didnt knock him out but what fight were some ppl watching??? Anyways, Marquez is pretty good but he's not on the same level. Marquez doesn't have big names under his resume as Pacquiao does... I'll give him Marco Antonio Barrera... but I don't think a win over a washed up Morales (post-Pacquiao), an overrated Casamayor, and a young, still raw Juan Diaz can be considered marquee wins plus a loss to Chris John (which I thought was a close fight). Pacquiao's resume includes: 2 wins over Morales, 2 wins over Barrera (including Barrera's first KO loss), 1 win on Marquez, a win over a bigger De La Hoya, and a win over Hatton in his prime. Compare the 2 and tell me who has a better rap sheet. Anyways, everyone has their own opinion and I don't think JMM deserves such a high P4P ranking. I think Shane Mosley and Paul Williams should be ahead of him anyways.