He wasn't like a golovkin,he did have pop I'm not denying that hes just not the killer make him out to be,he has virtually identical Ko percentage as Calzaghe so that's about his level is say
I agree 100% with floyd,the annoying thing is when people buy into the 0 meaning greatness and what's even more annoying is the fact he could have achieved a whole lot more.he is now saying Khan isnt a big enough name when guerro Ortiz maidana and so on all are??? How do people buy into it.he is a supremely gifted fighter but has refused to test himself against the true elite,pacquiao is a truly great fighter tho.his list of opposition dating back over a decade he has constantly tested himself to the limit and is still having to chase a fight with flits who will not fight him no matter what **** he comes out with,the fight isn't happening.
Hagler was a great,fought everybody,I thought he was a bad loser against Leonard,he might have won he might have lost,it was a close fight,u have just got to accept the decision not retire and run away
Robinson has many a great name on his record but if you filter out the garbage in between I don't think his achievements outweight pax mans.
I know it's blasphemy in boxing to suggest that but look at the streak of fighters pac fought from ledebwa onwards,you could easily throw 5 or 6 no hopers I between each of them fighters and his record would be compatible to srr.i'm not disrespecting Robinson,he was ahead of his time and a tremendous fighter it's just when people say it is impossible to surpass him it's nonesence as good as he was