There is definitely zero chance they ever put him in the Fury again. He was completely dismantled and humiliated.
Wtf are you high on? He was a razor blade away from knocking Fury out. Stop that nonsense..
I had alot of money on Wilder, and i had to cash out because he was 8-0 down...this was reflected by the bookies having Fury as the favourite in the live odds, and the vast majority of people thinking Fury clearly won.
So that makes you part of a tiny minority who are out of ur fkn mind.
My point was that close rounds can go either way. there were very few 'clear' rounds.
You pieces of Trump trash and wannabe liberals look like the sacs of trash that you are.
Deontay "I'd rather be Windmilling" "Wilder" was HUMILIATED.
Hey Dummy, those two things don't go together.
Trolling idiot.
BT sport put a poll up...when it had 1000 votes then 90% had Fury winning. Now there are 123000 votes and only 14 % has Wilder winning and 77% has Fury...that says enough doesn't it ? Just look at the comments under that poll it's on their YouTube channel.
If you don't post a link, I won't bother.
Let me look I'm on mobile right now so I don't know if I can...but you can check out it yourself on their YouTube channel..it's right there. Yeah sorry can't link it, it's on their community part of their YouTube channel, can only find it on the app. And I cant copy something from the app.
Fair enough, I've been there myself
ESPN panel picked Wilder to win but so did Marsalis Wilder so yea it must be a draw or Wilder won.
I'm not so sure what you mean by this comment? Are you saying they were just defending their pre fight predictions?
Their history clearly shows that they don't do that. Not only that, ESPN's scorecard is filled out by Dan Rafael, not the other predictors.
Correct. He hates Fury/BJS/MTK
He calls out fighters who delay fights, cancel fights and get popped for steroid cheating. He's a journalist, it's his job. And as a fight fan, he get's tired of fights being postponed like all the rest of us. Oh wait, I forgot, British fans don't mind that if it means their fighters will keep their titles a little longer.......
P.S. I love how Fury is getting love from you natural bandwagon jumpers overnight lol
Wilder lost.
It was a draw actually and ESPN scored it for Wilder. That said, I was really surprised that Fury did as well as he did. But if you're a reasonable person, you can admit that I was razor close on my prediction based on the 12th rd. Fury rose from a very, very hard KD.
Fury v wilder was worse.
Even though gg g best nel o it was more along lines of suspect decision. Nel o was better than gg g in certain aspects. Wilder wasnt better at anything other than missing punches
Not sure how you could say that.
In the first fight he almost scored a late KO and dropped Fury earlier so you could say he was better at landing the biggest shots of fight #1. That's a 4 point swing in two rounds right there.
You noobs dont know sht about boxing. Why dont you millenial phags go pull up those queer azz skinny jeans and take some more selfies next to your boyfriends.
Fury will make wilder look like a dummy that he is and you guys can bump this later.
Wilder is a glorified Thunderbox fighter. You young punks know that show? Probably not cuz ya dont know much about anything.
Fury will not only get beat but he will get KTFO. Wait and see.
Canelo won rounds 2 and 3 outright as well as 10 and 11.
Rounds 1, 4, and 12 were all potential swing rounds.
If you saw it otherwise you're just not an objective fan and I'm not trying to insult or fault you
So, if I didn't see it exactly like YOU, I'm not objective, when more of the boxing experts saw it the way that I did?
:duh: Makes perfect sense. lol
You are human trash and an obvious Trump supporter. Take your redneck ways and GTFO this country and off to Russia, punk!
The only thing that was clear - round after round - was how much better Fury was.
Best case scenario for Fury was 117-110 (Round 9 was a 9-9 round).
Worst case scenario for Fury was 113-113 (Wilder gets 5 rounds including two 10-8 rounds)
Fury was robbed. So sad.
Stfu you dumb c@nt
You know sh@t about boxing and less about me
If you said something like that to me in my face, I'd knock them chicklets out. B@TCH!
Well even if you did, it would be a draw...so your previous post is incorrect
The fight had the feeling of a draw to me if you don't include the KD's so obviously, I don't agree with you but like I said, I intend to actually score the fight in 15 second intervals with the KD's included and I'll let you know what I come up with. That's the most accurate way that I feel like I can really score controversial fights effectively. I can't do it at work so gimme some time.
Personally I think the Fury robbery was more blatant, you really can't make an argument for Wilder winning, whereas at least Canelo won more than two rounds against GGG, and the fight was closer, although Golovkin won clearly.
Thoughts?
GGG landed way more than Canelo, hurt him and didn't get dropped twice. I'd say GGG got ripped off way worse.
Neither were robberies, they were close fights.
Pac vs Bradley 1 was a robbery.
I scored the 1st GGG v. Canelo fight 8-4, the same that I scored Pac v. Bradley I.
Not even close (or shouldn't be). Nelo vs GGG 1 is only a robbery in GGGs fans eyes (and yes, experts can be biased).
90% of everyone including experts agree that Canelo didn't win more than 4 rounds so it's not just a GGG fan opinion.
Consensus is that the fight was a robbery, so in turn it was.
Google ''worst robberies in boxing''.
Lol ..... It's irrelevant to use Google for this but it looks like it backfired on you anyways
And I don't need Google because I live boxing and would be the one of the ones filling in the websites that produce such lists
Lol yeah he would because Fury won way more than that...if he gave Fury less he would be seen as an even bigger retard. Most people had Fury winning 9 rounds.
Most people? Who? Fury fans? because there were a lot if them in Los Angeles that night.
Most experts lean towards effective aggression. It's hard to win with such a low work-rate.
In both fights Canelo won a minimum of 4 rounds and lost a few swing rounds. Not seeing the robbery aspect of it all.
Sometimes fights are just close and they dont go the way you wanted
I gave Canelo all the close rounds and still came up with 4 in the first fight.
And like I already mentioned, everyone with sense pretty much said GGG won including every member of the broadcast crew and expert ringside scorer Lederman.
That makes it a robbery, obviously.
Nelo vs GGG could have gone either way.
GGG dared Nelo to get Mexican and that shlt backfired on GGG.
So, you're talking about the 2nd fight, right?
We are not.
That's definitely not how the first fight went.
Of the 2, there was only 1 close fight where I could see maybe GGG getting the nod (btw, I'm not referring to the Mexican Standoff fight).
Lol @ the Mexican standoff remark. Good stuff
That said, the first fight was a robbery.
GGG out threw and out landed Canelo in both fights and was only hurt maybe once in the rematch w/ a body shot. Canelo looked hurt in both fights several times. Especially the first. Remember the head shakes? Yeah, that happened.
I would accept a draw in the 2nd fight, but Canelo didn't separate himself from GGG either.
Canelo/GGG x2. At least Wilder was able to score a knockdown and make it close. GGG was clearly robbed in both fights, especially the first one.
Agreed, good post
Well, Fury won 9 or 10 rounds so I'd say giving him 6 rounds is clear hatred and bias.
Won 9 or 10 rounds based on what? He threw less punches and barely landed more. And are you forgetting the KD's and the 3rd judges scorecard?
Having Wilder winning is not crazy by any stretch.
Are you kidding. Anyone who is upset at the fact that GGG/Canelo wasn't one of the biggest robberies ever just doesn't understand boxing.
Wilder dropped Fury twice. That's 4 points by itself.
This, great post
Fury v Wilder I was not really a robbery