Katie Taylor vs. Amanda Serrano : How many rounds did you give Katie Taylor with her sorry-ass punching technique?

{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/mMablsZ.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/qMKWtyR.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/soFXYN0.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/tDNiBKH.gif"} This is Katie Taylor's work from round 2, as you can see this is crap : Taylor hits Amanda on the crown of her head, back of the head, neck, or barely makes any contact ; a lot of Katies shots were blocked. To be fair to Taylor, she lands the best punch of the round @ 1.10 but the majority of her punches are not clean and sloppy. In real time, these grazing shots with the input of commentators that make mistakes calling the scraping blows hard strikes, convinces the untrained eye. Compare this to Amanda's consistent steady clean-work, you cant give Taylor round 2. I got the Amanda winning rounds : 2,4-5-6-10, round 5 is a 10-8. I have not studied rounds 3 in detail but you can also give Amanda a couple swing rounds. Stop telling me that Katie Taylor beat Amanda Serrano, your a dumbass and should be embarrassed for your low-level of boxing knowledge. Now get the F-OUT of my thread! Taylor had 3 of the ten on my card. That was a first card watch too. I can’t go back and rewatch without being a bit biased at this point. Honesty man

I don't watch female and I thought Laila Ali was the best inboxing. But I have heard Katie is creme de la creme so I will try watch it. To be frank I only saw 5th round. Your a liar

These ignorant-inexperienced and dishonest judges robbed my boy billeau2. I was trained in Aikido as a young-boy but I got my ass kicked because it sucks, I should of boxed in that fight -- which was the first martial-art that I ever learned, but NOOO, I wanted to look cool. But later when I was a teen my elder brother introduced me to his boss who worked security, he was a master Kickboxer and coached on the weekends. He took me to a tournament in Venice Beach, I thought it was pretty cool and wished that I could become the next 'Bloodsport' , but I never had enough training to compete at the high-level. But anyways back to Katie Taylor vs. Amanda Serrano. https://i.imgur.com/TCx2B8Q.gif I cant make this stuff up, look at how Katie pulls the first left-hook in this gif, its as if she has mastered the ability to create an illusion that her punch lands! Katie's deceiving method of winning decision's, should be called 'Forgery' : I noticed that, her evasive-tactics combined with rapid ineffective-offense creates the illusion of effective-effort. Like you noted, eyes are meant to be tricked ; and I guess that is a art-form in itself. Katie Taylor should be renamed 'Lady-Houdini' for all the times she escapes and vanishes with her belts. Many people wind up training in great martial arts because of experience in a martial art that was lacking. Aikido, the way it is trained in the Western World and most of the Japanese world is crap. There are notable exceptions... and it works great for bouncing (Sankyo!)... Yeah Katie gets away with murder! lol.

6-4 Serrano

'The Bray Bomber' is Katie's moniker, what a joke. Who named her that?! You brought up a important point, the punch-connect was close. However as stressed in this thread, many of the blows that Katie was credited for were : grazing, glancing, weak, and off the target area to count as clean-punches. Further, some of Taylors strikes were even with the wrist or slaps. Just awful. I also noticed that not many fans are praising Katie's footwork, probably because literally throughout the fight Amanda was only separated by a split-second from Taylor ; that tells they were mostly fighting Amanda's fight, THE WHOLE FIGHT -- ring-generalship is the point I'm arguing, among other things. {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/PFBa798.gif"} Did you lose your score too, maricon? I remember you had me on ignore on the old forum, EAT SHT! I have no idea who you are, so if I had you on ignore, it was probably worth it. And you can quote me when Tim Tszyu loses to the top guys.

https://i.imgur.com/66oO39i.png https://i.imgur.com/Z85ks9F.png https://i.imgur.com/HOTMQvG.png

You are trying to mislead. Taylor landed the cleanest shots and won the round. Serrano did nothing. You went through the round and cherry picked to try and make it look like Serrano won and still failed because you couldn't find anything Serrano landed. :lol1: {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/Lo2ODVI.png"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/Te50GhP.png"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/YxEV0ZR.png"}

Perhaps the thread starter would like to explain why he left shots like this out of his gifs. :rolleyes: https://imgur.com/3QwBP2X Why dont you go back to page 1 and read the initial post, in which I acknowledged the fact that Katie landed the best punch of the round? Unfortunately, Amanda returned fire and landed a flush shot on Taylor. The premise of this thread is Katie Taylor's poor-sloppy-sorry-ass-punching-technique, not a punch-count, if you paid attention perhaps you would not be alluding or suggesting that I'm trying to mislead the boxingscene. Your effort to divert attention to the issue at hand and derail this thread is apparent, Barrett.

According to Dazn and Matchroom protocol....I gave the fight to Katie 11 rounds to 5 with 3 even. {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","title":"68108919c7350dc8fd35d5130f694824.gif","data-attachmentid":31399296} https://i.imgur.com/icMZF2z.gif Literally nothing land apart from the shots in the clinch which i said. You went through round 2 and these are all you could find. Thanks for proving my argument. :rofl: https://i.imgur.com/nPOOdhK.gif Well this comment makes me glad that I left-out the rest of Amanda's work of round 2. I had a feeling that you would pull this crap, so its double win for me ; I saved myself some time and the two extra gifs of Amanda's masterful effective-aggression only magnifies Katie Taylor's sloppy-ass-punching-illegal-techniques.

Just watched round 2 and Serrano lands nothing apart from a couple of body shots in a clinch. Also noticed you left some of Taylors landed shots out. Clear Taylor round. Not even debateable. Notice how thread started posted no landed serrano shots? Because there was none. :lol1: https://i.imgur.com/fEBrSjl.gif https://i.imgur.com/7dIz0At.gif Poor fella. Now Robbie Barrett, you challenged me before about a particular instance in Wilder vs. Ortiz I, that everyone seemed to miss ( but me ). I'm referring to round 2, in which 'The Bronze-Bum' was not credited a knockdown when Wilder dropped Luis Ortiz with a JAB, by referee David Fields @ 1:42. You remember that you ended up conceding to my argument when the hard evidence was presented -- as is the case in this topic. I went through the trouble of making these gifs of some of Amanda Serrano's offense in round 2, which clearly refute your argument and failure to recognize and acknowledge Amanda's work. Give me clean well-timed accurate punches over Taylor's wild-sloppy-ass-glancing-wrist-punches, slaps and illegal blows all day. Anyone is free to compare the clips from round 2 posted in previous pages of this thread, of Katie Taylor's amateur and crude weak punches ( that missed the legal-target-area ) to Amanda Serrano's accurate punches ; the knowledgeable boxing fan that abides by the established rules of scoring will prefer Amanda's skillful accurate and clean work as oppose to all the sloppy crap from Taylor that dont even count. '' Clear Taylor round. Not even debateable. '' -- Robbie Barrett.

{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/mMablsZ.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/qMKWtyR.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/soFXYN0.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/tDNiBKH.gif"} This is Katie Taylor's work from round 2, as you can see this is crap : Taylor hits Amanda on the crown of her head, back of the head, neck, or barely makes any contact ; a lot of Katies shots were blocked. To be fair to Taylor, she lands the best punch of the round @ 1.10 but the majority of her punches are not clean and sloppy. In real time, these grazing shots with the input of commentators that make mistakes calling the scraping blows hard strikes, convinces the untrained eye. Compare this to Amanda's consistent steady clean-work, you cant give Taylor round 2. I got the Amanda winning rounds : 2,4-5-6-10, round 5 is a 10-8. I have not studied rounds 3 in detail but you can also give Amanda a couple swing rounds. Stop telling me that Katie Taylor beat Amanda Serrano, your a dumbass and should be embarrassed for your low-level of boxing knowledge. Now get the F-OUT of my thread! According to Dazn and Matchroom protocol....I gave the fight to Katie 11 rounds to 5 with 3 even. {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","title":"68108919c7350dc8fd35d5130f694824.gif","data-attachmentid":31399296}

Heres the problem: while other sports, like fencing for example, long ago realized that the hand is quicker than the eye, and that subtlety is the mark of a professional, instituted scoring systems that compensate for this, corrupt boxing gives not two shiats. I first realized this problem years back.. when i was fighting martial arts, i was teaching a group and I would never win a bout... I was trained to make the opponent just miss and catch them which I did but inevitably it translated as the opponent getting a point. No one can possibly see when a fighter just avoids a blow... especially not old azz men with glasses and with corrupt agendas. So yes, Amanda does not get hit clean but Katie "can't lose a decision" Taylor remains the judges favorite. Yeah it sucks... I hate scoring in boxing and really never take it seriously when a fight is close. These ignorant-inexperienced and dishonest judges robbed my boy billeau2. I was trained in Aikido as a young-boy but I got my ass kicked because it sucks, I should of boxed in that fight -- which was the first martial-art that I ever learned, but NOOO, I wanted to look cool. But later when I was a teen my elder brother introduced me to his boss who worked security, he was a master Kickboxer and coached on the weekends. He took me to a tournament in Venice Beach, I thought it was pretty cool and wished that I could become the next 'Bloodsport' , but I never had enough training to compete at the high-level. But anyways back to Katie Taylor vs. Amanda Serrano. https://i.imgur.com/TCx2B8Q.gif I cant make this stuff up, look at how Katie pulls the first left-hook in this gif, its as if she has mastered the ability to create an illusion that her punch lands! Katie's deceiving method of winning decision's, should be called 'Forgery' : I noticed that, her evasive-tactics combined with rapid ineffective-offense creates the illusion of effective-effort. Like you noted, eyes are meant to be tricked ; and I guess that is a art-form in itself. Katie Taylor should be renamed 'Lady-Houdini' for all the times she escapes and vanishes with her belts.

{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/mMablsZ.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/qMKWtyR.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/soFXYN0.gif"} {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/tDNiBKH.gif"} This is Katie Taylor's work from round 2, as you can see this is crap : Taylor hits Amanda on the crown of her head, back of the head, neck, or barely makes any contact ; a lot of Katies shots were blocked. To be fair to Taylor, she lands the best punch of the round @ 1.10 but the majority of her punches are not clean and sloppy. In real time, these grazing shots with the input of commentators that make mistakes calling the scraping blows hard strikes, convinces the untrained eye. Compare this to Amanda's consistent steady clean-work, you cant give Taylor round 2. I got the Amanda winning rounds : 2,4-5-6-10, round 5 is a 10-8. I have not studied rounds 3 in detail but you can also give Amanda a couple swing rounds. Stop telling me that Katie Taylor beat Amanda Serrano, your a dumbass and should be embarrassed for your low-level of boxing knowledge. Now get the F-OUT of my thread! Heres the problem: while other sports, like fencing for example, long ago realized that the hand is quicker than the eye, and that subtlety is the mark of a professional, instituted scoring systems that compensate for this, corrupt boxing gives not two shiats. I first realized this problem years back.. when i was fighting martial arts, i was teaching a group and I would never win a bout... I was trained to make the opponent just miss and catch them which I did but inevitably it translated as the opponent getting a point. No one can possibly see when a fighter just avoids a blow... especially not old azz men with glasses and with corrupt agendas. So yes, Amanda does not get hit clean but Katie "can't lose a decision" Taylor remains the judges favorite. Yeah it sucks... I hate scoring in boxing and really never take it seriously when a fight is close.

No doubt, of the two, Serrano is the puncher. Taylor needs to get in and get the hell out. She didn't do that in the 4th and 5th and it nearly ended her evening early. Yes, it's true, Taylor punches like a girl, so does Shields but it turns out you can still win if you land enough weak punches. I thought Serrano won as well but there were enough close rounds that I could easily have scored for Taylor to give her the win. This is fair and a non biased way to look at it

One thing I notice about you is you consistenly pick losers. You did this with Wilder too, you lose and are wrong ---> a lot. I originally picked Serrano to win, but Taylor clearly won the fight. Stop gambling your money and losing. Hey War Room, tell me how many rounds you gave Katie, cause I been pulling these chumps cards and handing L's since page 1. By the way, who called the 'Takeover' over Bumachenko? Andy Ruiz over A.J, Oleksandr to school Joshua? Jack Catterall over the 'Tart-Tomato' Josh Taylor?

{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/9sWcZwm.gif"} Can you also please tell them that Clarresa Shields should be their #1. P4P women's boxer, not this fraud Katie Taylor. Its a travesty that boxrec list the 'G.W.O.A.T' at #10. on the P4P, you know cause she is truly a 'undisputed' world champion? But I'm glad that Clarresa was calling the play-by-play with Tony Bellew this weekend, maybe Taylor-Serrano will prepare Shield's to train to KO Savanah Marshall and avoid a robbery. Lol Shields? KO? you are living on cloud nonsense.

I had it 7-3 Taylor. Serrano tried to be the bully but was mentally defeated when she couldn't get Taylor out of there in 5. Taylor had that extra gear to dig deep, much like Ward did in the first Kovalev fight. Serrano did not and landed nothing of note rounds 7-10. Taylor bullied the bully.

I've sent your little clip to Boxrec. Let's see if they change the result for you. {"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/9sWcZwm.gif"} Can you also please tell them that Clarresa Shields should be their #1. P4P women's boxer, not this fraud Katie Taylor. Its a travesty that boxrec list the 'G.W.O.A.T' at #10. on the P4P, you know cause she is truly a 'undisputed' world champion? But I'm glad that Clarresa was calling the play-by-play with Tony Bellew this weekend, maybe Taylor-Serrano will prepare Shield's to train to KO Savanah Marshall and avoid a robbery.

https://i.imgur.com/NEgm7Sj.gif I've sent your little clip to Boxrec. Let's see if they change the result for you.

I've just checked Boxrec, KATIE TAYLOR WON. https://i.imgur.com/NEgm7Sj.gif