Suppose Errol Spence beats Pac and the PPV does good numbers. What's a fair purse split against Crawford?

What Crawford doesn't realize is that Spence can easily go up and fight Canelo also. He has many more options.

50-50 would be fair. I'm no expert in the inner workings of the boxing financial world but why would anyone think Spence would deserve any less than 50-50? 40-60 at the most, if it requires concessions to make the deal happen. Spence and Bud are reasonably close in terms of star power. Bud might be considered a little better by people...

50-50 considering the fact that Spence is taking the wrong end of an 80-20 split for the Pacquiao fight. And why would Spence take 50% of a purse for a fight that he brings in 75% of the income. Dumb, even for a complete moron like you.

70-30 would be generous to Bud

Why would Errol give up 50/50 when he is in the driver's seat with all the numbers in his favor? Dud Crawford should be the one who gives up his absurd, entitled demands. Don't you think? LIS, does he deserve 50/50? No, but do you think there will be a fight if he doesn't get that split?

GTFOH how can you be a B-side against a non PPV fighter? If the only reason the guy is on PPV is his opponent he aint no A-side. That's Wilder. No Money without Joshua or Fury. Throw out PPV if you like. Who has drawn better tv ratings and gate revenue in the US? Wilder. That makes Joshua the B-side here. Same goes for Errol Spence. He has better tv ratings and gate revenue...and in his case you have no reason to throw out the PPV numbers.

Crawford has to put his pride to the side and accept that B side or we have to blame him 100% for the fight not happening. He shuda never resigned with top rank, he put himself in a situation to get set $$$ over positioning himself by fighting the PBC guys and increasing his stock to demand 50/50. But he didn't so Spence slowly increased his stalk. Now it's the point of no return

Why would Errol give up 50/50 when he is in the driver's seat with all the numbers in his favor? Dud Crawford should be the one who gives up his absurd, entitled demands. Don't you think? Roll, stop calling Bud insulting names. Other than that your points are on point.

Real numbers like revenue? Joshua was drawing over 10x more. That didn't stop 50/50 cries from stupids. Again be consistent. If Spence fights a more popular fighter of course he'll do more. If he fights on a channel available in more homes of course he'll do more. How many PPVs does he do against fighters of similar popularity to who fought Crawford? Like for like. Not skewed BS. Joshua doesn't draw 10x more in the US. He's the B-side here. It is what it is. Crawford had the same opportunity to fight Pacquiao. He couldn't get it done. Spence is making it happen so no excuses.

spence shouldn't fight crawford. deny crawford an opportunity for a career defining win.just move up to his more natural weight classes of middleweight or super middleweight and fight canelo someone his own size for once. u'll see right away how mediocre spence is when he can't weight bully smaller fighters. I don’t think either Crawford or Spence are that good.

Numbers are numbers. Joshua had a far bigger upper hand with numbers. That didn't prevent the stupids saying 50/50. All i ask for is consistency. If Wilder deserved 50% then Crawford does. Don't be flip flopping PBC fanboys. Purse splits are based on real numbers that you can bring to the table. Crawford has no numbers in his favor over Spence as of now. And he will fall even farther behind if Errol beats Pac and sells well on that PPV.

Leave Arum and Split won't be a issue at all because both will be compensated fairly and VERY WELL!

He brought plenty. It wouldn't be PPV without him. He also brought UK PPV. Fury is similar to Wilder. He needs someone to do numbers with. There's plenty of equivalency. Wilder didn't deserve 50% to anyone with common sense. But the same idiots saying he did dismiss their arguments they made then when it comes to Spence-Crawford. It's called double standards, hypocrisy. I've shown you that Wilder had the upper hand over Joshua with the US numbers. In what area would Crawford have the upper hand over Spence? :thinking:

20mil minimum from the superstar Spence. Deal with PBC how they like to deal with everyone else. Otherwise no undisputed for Spence.

Wilder doesn't either without a dance partner. So the dance partner deserves a split. Meanwhile Joshua does PPV fighting anyone in the UK so wilder would deserve less of a split there. That means no 50/50. Understand? Common sense, you have any? Yes, let's use common sense and facts. You think Fury brought anything to the table as a dance partner? He sold 3,577 tickets for the Wallin fight for f​​​vck's sake. :lol1: And you keep avoiding my questions...how is there any equivalency between Joshua-Wilder and Crawford-Spence?

65/35 spence seems fair to me at that point...who knows though

Crawford will likely have to take whatever's offered... if he still wants to fight Spence.

Joshua sells PPV without Wilder or Fury. Wilder doesn't sell **** without Fury or Joshua. How does Wilder deserve all the US revenue? As i said, Sense>>>>>>Window. Joshua doesn't sell PPVs in the US. And the last time he fought here he was sent home with his tail between his legs.

After Spence beats Pacquiao there shouldn’t be a PPV split. Crawford can get $6-7 million flat fee. More than he’s worth.

Whatever it takes to make the fight happen. If Errol has to give up 50/50 then so be it. Doubt Crawford takes anything less. Does he realistically deserve 50/50 in this hypothetical? Of course not, but.... Why would Errol give up 50/50 when he is in the driver's seat with all the numbers in his favor? Dud Crawford should be the one who gives up his absurd, entitled demands. Don't you think?