Should Mark Breland sue Deontay Wilder?

Have to prove it cost you money to sue for slander or defamation.

I say sue him. For trying to besmirch Breland's good name.

It's not worth it. Wilder can fire off Breland for nothing and from all the interviews I've read he has suggested things about Breland more than outright accused him, not to a degree that would go in Brelands favour in court anyway. And it hasn't done Brelands future job opportunities any harm either. Nobody other than a few sweaty racists on YouTube and their sheeple dumb followers are holding any stock in it. Everybody else knows how God damn ridiculous it is and knows Breland is legit and trustworthy. The man's better off out of there, I read so much about his frustrations with Deontay and Deas over the years.

You think if he accused him of spiking his water and then didn't fire him then there wouldn't be a problem? I think you're a long way off the mark here. Agreed, fighters fire/switch trainers all the time. They NEVER accuse their own trainers of drugging them though, that is a criminal accusation and is taken seriously.

All of this Breeland feelings comes from the firing. No firing and the spike claim would get shrugged off. You think if he accused him of spiking his water and then didn't fire him then there wouldn't be a problem? I think you're a long way off the mark here.

What stems from the firing? We're talking about his right to sue for damage to his career from false allegations. What are you talking about? Maybe. You have to prove it though before you run around making serious allegations. All of this Breeland feelings comes from the firing. No firing and the spike claim would get shrugged off.

Maybe it was spiked Maybe. You have to prove it though before you run around making serious allegations.

It all stems from the firing. Don't kid yourself What stems from the firing? We're talking about his right to sue for damage to his career from false allegations. What are you talking about?

You are arguing 2 separate points. The original post is about defamation from wilder towards breland alleging that he spiked wilder drink but here you are harping on wilder firing him... I dont think anyone is arguing if wilder has the fight to fire whoever he wants. And if I was a boxer I would know and understand that the possibility of my Trainer stopping the fight if I am getting worked beyond belief is a real live possibility. Its how the sport works. It all stems from the firing. Don't kid yourself

In this wussified time we are in, I'm sure the courts are flooded with cu nts crying over being defamed. He won't be throwing towels anytime soon. Question - If you were a boxer, would you be cool with your employee doing what you told him not to do ? You are arguing 2 separate points. The original post is about defamation from wilder towards breland alleging that he spiked wilder drink but here you are harping on wilder firing him... I dont think anyone is arguing if wilder has the fight to fire whoever he wants. And if I was a boxer I would know and understand that the possibility of my Trainer stopping the fight if I am getting worked beyond belief is a real live possibility. Its how the sport works.

The original post was about defamation which is a real thing. Not about being fired. In this wussified time we are in, I'm sure the courts are flooded with cu nts crying over being defamed. He won't be throwing towels anytime soon. Question - If you were a boxer, would you be cool with your employee doing what you told him not to do ?

The courts won't spend more than a minute on such a lawsuit. There was no ''you can't fire me'' clause. The original post was about defamation which is a real thing. Not about being fired.

This isn't related to Breland's duty of care. If Wilder doesn't like that he threw the towel in then sack him. No problem. But claiming a trainer spiked a boxer's water is slander. It wouldn't be frivolous to sue for damages. He's undoubtedly damaged. Maybe it was spiked

Thats one way to look at it. The courts won't spend more than a minute on such a lawsuit. There was no ''you can't fire me'' clause.

Just what American courts need, another frivolous lawsuit :lol1: The boss gave his employees rules to follow. This isn't related to Breland's duty of care. If Wilder doesn't like that he threw the towel in then sack him. No problem. But claiming a trainer spiked a boxer's water is slander. It wouldn't be frivolous to sue for damages. He's undoubtedly damaged.

Just what American courts need, another frivolous lawsuit :lol1: The boss gave his employees rules to follow. Thats one way to look at it.

If his reputation is damaged and it affects his ability to find work, he could sue him probably. Slander. Defamation of character. I don't know, and I'm not suggesting it necessarily. Hence the question. Just what American courts need, another frivolous lawsuit :lol1: The boss gave his employees rules to follow.

On what grounds ? If his reputation is damaged and it affects his ability to find work, he could sue him probably. Slander. Defamation of character. I don't know, and I'm not suggesting it necessarily. Hence the question.

Seriously, should he? I like Wilder, but he's making some ridiculous accusations. If this affects Breland's work opportunities, he should consider filing a lawsuit. On what grounds ?

No, and I doubt Breeland would do that. He knows that Wilder is emotionally unstable right now.