[22 FOULS] This is Why Rigondeaux Quit

Well, I appreciate the work you put into the gifs even though you've been getting owned in this thread. I didn't notice that many dirty punches from Loma when I first watched the fight. Fight was pretty dirty from both guys clearly. I don't have much sympathy for Rigo when he ducks too low as it's cheating but there are a couple of good examples of cheap Lomachenko hits in the gifs that you posted.

As a pro boxer, and a person who has done this their entire life, this is no excuse at all... You have to able to adjust and adapt..to many damn excuses are made these days Then why didn't McClellan adjust? Why is he a vegetable now? As a professional Boxer you expect the ref to behave like all the others do. Get into a clinch, the ref breaks you up. Having an absentee ref who isn't citing the other guy for fouls and citing you for jack shít, there is no adjustment. Same thing here, ref doesn't break them properly and look at what happens: Also, being able to adjust normally is a very rare commodity in professional Boxing. Like 12 or less in history had that ability. Sorry, McRetard, but when the fighter ducks like that the ref will be more lenient with certain blows because they're deliberately presenting that area to be struck. Try again, Mongo. No they're not. A fixed ref, sure, but a normal ref needs to do normal ref stuff. YDKSAB. I looked. I see a waste of space, a waste of time and a lot of whining over very little and I'm not sure if it's trolling or just butthurt and I don't care that much either way. I got work, precious. I know e-space is an endangered resource, but I need to plant these seeds of doubt. I don't expect a complete turn around, I fully understand how the human brain works under these conditions. But a sprinkle of doubt over 14 pages is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you for being part of that. In talks with a video editor so there will be a video that covers all aspects of this fight.

Dear Casual of Peasantry, You can NOT foul another fighter because he's fouling. This means no punching to the back of the head as well as no biting of the ear. There are 22 for a reason. Also, that is a rule that is not enforced. Sweet Pea, Augustus, Byrd, Mayweather, the list goes on and on. Never once in history was a point deducted for it and never once in history did that turn someone into a vegetable. Get Better, -McNulty Behind the ear is considered the back of the head. There are some borderline ones, but not tha majority by far. Look closer fool. I looked. I see a waste of space, a waste of time and a lot of whining over very little and I'm not sure if it's trolling or just butthurt and I don't care that much either way. I got work, precious.

Where are the fouls ?

Dear Casual of Peasantry, You can NOT foul another fighter because he's fouling. This means no punching to the back of the head as well as no biting of the ear. There are 22 for a reason. Also, that is a rule that is not enforced. Sweet Pea, Augustus, Byrd, Mayweather, the list goes on and on. Never once in history was a point deducted for it and never once in history did that turn someone into a vegetable. Get Better, -McRetard Behind the ear is considered the back of the head. There are some borderline ones, but not tha majority by far. Look closer fool. Sorry, McRetard, but when the fighter ducks like that the ref will be more lenient with certain blows because they're deliberately presenting that area to be struck. Try again, Mongo.

Didnt Wlad use the same excuse for his lost to Brewster? You know what I think you are right. It is a tie. LOL

Razor Ruddock still had the best excuse of all. He claimed the Brits and Lewis's people poisoned him LOL Didnt Wlad use the same excuse for his lost to Brewster?

As a pro boxer, and a person who has done this their entire life, this is no excuse at all... You have to able to adjust and adapt..to many damn excuses are made these days Razor Ruddock still had the best excuse of all. He claimed the Brits and Lewis's people poisoned him LOL

As a pro boxer, and a person who has done this their entire life, this is no excuse at all... You have to able to adjust and adapt..to many damn excuses are made these days

Three out of 22 and he's bending below the waist for two of them, and spinning in the other? Try again, retard. Dear Casual of Peasantry, You can NOT foul another fighter because he's fouling. This means no punching to the back of the head as well as no biting of the ear. There are 22 for a reason. Also, that is a rule that is not enforced. Sweet Pea, Augustus, Byrd, Mayweather, the list goes on and on. Never once in history was a point deducted for it and never once in history did that turn someone into a vegetable. Get Better, -McNulty Getting punched in the ear is not a rabbit punch. I can't believe you put so much work into this sh*t. Behind the ear is considered the back of the head. There are some borderline ones, but not tha majority by far. Look closer fool.

Getting punched in the ear is not a rabbit punch. I can't believe you put so much work into this sh*t.

These weren't behind the ear either right? FOUL #5: Back of Head #4 (3x) via GIPHY FOUL #11: Back of Head #9 via GIPHY FOUL #19: Back of Head #14 (4x) via GIPHY Three out of 22 and he's bending below the waist for two of them, and spinning in the other? Try again, retard.

Not sure why I don't see more people tlaking about this, maybe y'all just don't notice the finer details. I found 22 fouls from Lomachenko during his fight with Rigondeaux. Many of which precipitated Rigondeaux retaliating so in basically, Rigondeaux was returning the favor but got a point taken and a bunch of warnings where Lomachenko got very few. When you're fighting a bigger guy two weight divisions ahead thats fouling at an exponential rate, fighting the venue (ref, judges), fighting your old promotional company (Top Rank) who are known for fight fixing (FACT), and fighting the Commission (no solid reaons he should be stripped), is it really a shock he quit? By the referee not breaking the fighters up Rigondeaux was not getting the proper que's needed to reset and get back to work. There is a clinch, ref breaks it up rinse/repeat. Not some absentee ref who keeps saying break or fight out. Thats not referee'ing. During my focus on these clips I noticed something very interesting, Lomachenko would initiate most of the clinches so even if someone wanted to say Rigondeaux was holding, Lomachenko iniated the clinch. I'm going to do 5 gives per post so it's easy for anyone to respond and hopefully the page doesn't overload with processes. FOUL #1: Back of Head #1 via GIPHY FOUL #2: Back of Head #2 via GIPHY FOUL #3: Back of Head #3 via GIPHY FOUL #4: Elbow on Neck #1 via GIPHY FOUL #5: Back of Head #4 (3x) via GIPHY Possibly the worst post I've ever read on boxing scene and that is saying something with all the sh*t morons post on here. Can't be bothered to read through what others have said but hopefully its along the lines of please read the Marquess of Queensberry rules because clearly you haven't read them and don't understand the rules of boxing.

Those punches are exactly why ducking below the waist is a foul, because it does not present a legal way to attack. If a foul is committed as a result of the opponent committing another foul, neither are usually called for it. If the movement is in transit, yes. If the movement isn't in transit no. You can't intentionally foul any fighter under any circumstances. Learn the sport.

Keep telling yourself that when Lomo's balls are on your chin. Behind the ear is a rabbit punch which is considered BY THE RULES OF BOXING to be the back of the head. Get blocked troll!!! Those punches are exactly why ducking below the waist is a foul, because it does not present a legal way to attack. If a foul is committed as a result of the opponent committing another foul, neither are usually called for it. The clench hits are questionable at the very least but cmon now, we have people like Hopkins, Mayweather, Ward, Rigo who's whole game is based on getting away with fouls and questionable tactics. Why are you only upset now?

Lol. Loma wouldn't be able to throw a single punch because Rigo kept doing yoga and turning his head. Some of these labels are hillarious too. "back of the head" when 90% of them were to side head. "Elbow to head" when Rigo shoves his head in an armlock - which BTW happens in virtually every fight to every fighter. Go away troll. Keep telling yourself that when Lomo's balls are on your chin. Behind the ear is a rabbit punch which is considered BY THE RULES OF BOXING to be the back of the head. Get blocked troll!!!

this is a stretch. it wasn't a rough fight at all, and definitely no reason to quit.

Do one for Salido Lomachenko since we are being fair and unbiased today in NSB. I'm not talking about Salido, I'm talking about this fight. Why do people do that? This is the topic of discussion, lets talk about this fight not other stuff that has nothing to do with THIS FIGHT. "Wow! Loma made Rigo Quit!" "Salido doe .. and Loma was fouling Rigo" "Erm .. Salidoe do" "Salido has nothing to do with THIS FIGHT" :lol1:

Lol. Loma wouldn't be able to throw a single punch because Rigo kept doing yoga and turning his head. Some of these labels are hillarious too. "back of the head" when 90% of them were to side head. "Elbow to head" when Rigo shoves his head in an armlock - which BTW happens in virtually every fight to every fighter. Go away troll.

you'd better block me, there's no way you leave this interaction with more dignity than you've got now. Can't answer a simple question because you know you're wrong. You can't handle the truth. You obviously prefer dirty fighters, Ward is an ATG dirty fighter. Blocked bítch.