While I know he's not Ring ( who refuses the fight him and he's rated higher on the P4P rankings) and WBO (same), he has the WBA, IBF and WBC. In the past that was good enough for some, but he's not considered undisputed. Should he be? I understand he receives criticism (some just some unjust), but should that affect his status?
Discuss
Hell yes he should be considered the true middleweight champion of the world. Everybody knows he is the real middleweight champion even if some won't admit it because they dislike or hate him. Can anybody name a boxer who can make the 160 pound limit who would be favored to beat him? I think not.
No, let the coward win it in ring. To me WBA and WBC plus lineal is fine.He is no coward. Who are you to call him a coward over the safety of the internet. He has had nearly 400 amateur fights and 35 pro fights. How much fighting have you done? Not name calling but real fighting against other good fighters your weight. He can't win it in the ring because the other champs are afraid to fight him. He would fight them any time and knock them out.
Of course he is. Name someone who could dispute him at MW? the one who vacated and moved down? the one who said I'm not ready? the one who said he would beat him and Eubank jr on the same night?
Geale coming off a Barker loss is great but Jacobs coming off stopping Quillin in 1 sucks. Spoken like a true fanboy.
Why is Jacobs fighting Sergio Mora tho?
... must be proud of this sentence...
Well I don't see how you can have Golovkin undipsited when both jacobs and saunders have as good of wins as Golovkin does.. Ko1 Quillen and beating Eubanks is as good as beating murray or lemuiex,, Golovkin is clearly the number #1 guy but not undisputed like tyson at heavy or hopkins at middleweight
Easily. He beat Murray, Geale and Lemieux already. Billy Hoe Saunders and Jacobs suck and that's why they want insane amounts of money for that beat down
YES. 100% without a question. **** the belts. When you've beaten everybody in your division while the others refuse to fight you, he should without a shadow of a doubt be labeled undisputed. They should definitely try to make something like this a rule.
Too much of this "O lets a milk a fight" girly stuff. Nah boy you turned down the fight. That's forfeit.
No, he should not. Like some posters have said, he should be considered the number one middleweight, the man, the champion, etc.
Being undisputed can be just as hard on the negotiating table as in the ring. We can't arbitrarily start naming fighters undisputed just because we think they would come out on top during a titlist's tournament.
Essentially, he has to earn it, just like anyone else. People hate on Canelo, even I joked around a little bit, but he has a serious chance to beat GGG.
Probably, the WBO champ refuses to fight him. The so called lineal champ dropped his WBC belt and ran back down to JMW effectively giving up the lineal too in my mind. Thats just my opinion though.
9y ago
Should GGG be considered Undisputed Middleweight Champion? | BoxingScene Community