because most people on here are idiots are inferior to my superior intellect
Lol... I will give you credit for being smarter than most posters, even though your a cunt :luvbed:
Then get the fvck out of the thread... It's a legit topic...as you can see most of the thread is 50/50 maybe 60/40 canelo...
because most people on here are idiots are inferior to my superior intellect
I think canelo is a better boxer with a good resume, even though he is usually the bigger, stronger fighter in his matches, props to frampton for going to a higher division and face the bigger, stronger champion there, if canelo goes to 160 and beats ggg, he'd be king of p4p, but I doubt he'll ever do that.
another world class thread by diabetes ali
Then get the fvck out of the thread... It's a legit topic...as you can see most of the thread is 50/50 maybe 60/40 canelo...
Canelo has better wins, so i'd have to go with him.
But i'd have to say Canelo also seems the more beatable fighter and basically fights one way but he's very effective at getting the fight to go his way. Ignoring his Floyd to loss, no shame there. He was run incredibly close by Trout and Lara. I think we all know Canelo has a huge problem with guys that can move well. Frampton seems to be able to be able to do a lot of things well. He can be slick at times and move, but he can also fight in the pocket when he needs to.
I dunno, i'd have to go with Canelo because of his level of opposition. I don't really see the need to compare them anyway. Frampton is very good in his own right.
Carl Frampton has a better resume than Terence Crawford, definitely would consider putting Frampton in the top 5 ahead of Crawford If Crawfish is in the top 5.
Canelo.
I love Carl as a fighter (top guy too), but Canelo's wins are better and he's generally the better fighter. Carl is a top level fighter himself though, unquestionably.
Come on Canelo clearly at much better fighter with more skill
He out pointed Lara, Cotto, and Trout, Frampton just beat LSC thats it
I would say he's more skilled in most areas tbf.
Carl is skilled himself, but he gets hit clean a lot and can become predictable.
Canelo is much better defensively, he counters extremely well and his attack is more varied. Canelo's boxing is still highly under-rated by many, he's very highly skilled.
You guys are probably right, I have been drinking
He out pointed Lara, Cotto, and Trout, Frampton just beat LSC thats it
Good point, but Frampton did just go up in weight and beat an undefeated multi division champ in his prime, and a guy that was much bigger and rougher customer than lara, cotto or trout. How would canelo look if he moved up and fought lemuiex or Golovkin
I'm not so certain that canelo is more skilled..
I would say he's more skilled in most areas tbf.
Carl is skilled himself, but he gets hit clean a lot and can become predictable.
Canelo is much better defensively, he counters extremely well and his attack is more varied. Canelo's boxing is still highly under-rated by many, he's very highly skilled.
Canelo.
I love Carl as a fighter (top guy too), but Canelo's wins are better and he's generally the better fighter. Carl is a top level fighter himself though, unquestionably.