Well, Matchroom got away with making the Cleverly / Bellew fight PPV...this is a new low.
Paying to watch Frankie Gavin, priceless Lol.
I don't get why people say that.
This card is clearly in another stratosphere to the catastrophy that was Bellew-Cleverly2.
deontay wilder's dick.
DON'T CALL IT A COMEBACK
Where you been man? It's been a while.
Still embarassed about telling everyone how Porter would beat Mayweather before he got schooled by Ezekiel?
Slurp slurp Slurp...
Are you interested in seeing competitive matchups or do you just want to see them protect their "0" fighting tuneup after tuneup? :nonono:
Slurp what you retard?
Read my post again and then respond.
Well no but at least Chaves would make it somewhat competitive. Gavin has no chance he's soft, physically weak, poor accuracy, slow bad stamina he is absolute ****e this is nothing more than a exhibition.
Bunch of fooking Sheffield retards will turn out like morons. They don't know ***** about boxing.
Yeah but you don't get it mate. Nobody knows who the fuk he is. he's never beaten anyone good either. He's knocked out a bunch of bums in Argentina and came to the US to make the worst stinking fights you've ever seen in your life.
Hardly what people want in a showcase fight for Brook. I would rather watch Brook fight Gavin than Chaves - To shut Gavin up if nothing else and kill whatever little hype he has left from his days of calling out Pacquiao and saying he could beat Amir Khan. :lol1:
This card is good. No denying it. 3 genuine world title fights, Olympic gold medalist, 2 british title fights, commonwealth title fight etc. It's good. But there's no mega fight on there. Hell, there's not even a mega name. So why make it PPV?
Eddie Hearn says: "there's no way you can put Brook, Joshua on a card with 2 world title fights also without it being PPV".
Doesn't he know that nobody is asking for this to be on the same card? :lol1: Who's he trying to fool?
Is there anyone in the world who wouldn't gladly break this card up in two and have it on consecutive weekends instead? No. It's clear he's hustling to make PPV numbers for Sky.
Slurp slurp Slurp...
Are you interested in seeing competitive matchups or do you just want to see them protect their "0" fighting tuneup after tuneup? :nonono:
Chaves would've absolutely been a better opponent than Gavin. He's a better opponent than Rios as well.
He's been competitive with Thurman and Bradley - two top 5 welterweights, beat Rios and had him crying to the ref, has a strong amateur background, good skill, good power etc.
He wouldn't exactly be a hard opponent to sell either, an Argentinian puncher who's technically coming off a draw with Bradley (he lost in reality).
This card is good. No denying it. 3 genuine world title fights, Olympic gold medalist, 2 british title fights, commonwealth title fight etc. It's good. But there's no mega fight on there. Hell, there's not even a mega name. So why make it PPV?
Eddie Hearn says: "there's no way you can put Brook, Joshua on a card with 2 world title fights also without it being PPV".
Doesn't he know that nobody is asking for this to be on the same card? :lol1: Who's he trying to fool?
Is there anyone in the world who wouldn't gladly break this card up in two and have it on consecutive weekends instead? No. It's clear he's hustling to make PPV numbers for Sky.
I'm not saying Gavin would beat Chaves. What I'm saying is nobody knows who the fuk Chaves is. Hell, I could barely point him out in a line of average joes. So what's the point in Brook fighting him?
At least its two brits fighting.
Well no but at least Chaves would make it somewhat competitive. Gavin has no chance he's soft, physically weak, poor accuracy, slow bad stamina he is absolute ****e this is nothing more than a exhibition.
Bunch of fooking Sheffield retards will turn out like morons. They don't know ***** about boxing.
I would've honestly preferred the Chavez fight. He was very competitive against Thurman, Bradley and Rios. If Brook blasted him out, that would be a telling statement and if not at least it would be competitive. I don't see Gavin competing he's undersized, low volume with no power.
http://i.imgur.com/DEluGLx.gif
Frankie Gavin is pure ****e lol no way is he better than Chaves.
In all honestly Algieri is probably a better opponent than Tripe Gavin.
I'm not saying Gavin would beat Chaves. What I'm saying is nobody knows who the fuk Chaves is. Hell, I could barely point him out in a line of average joes. So what's the point in Brook fighting him?
At least its two brits fighting.
It's so good I sent a blank cheque to Eddie Hearn. I trust his sense of value not to rip me off.
You see what I meant by matchroom fan boys? Have a peek at post #15. :lol1:
When was the last time a uk promoter stacked the card with three world title fights?
Plus Anthony Joshua vs Kevin Johnson is a headline fight in it's own right.
Once again matchroom sport saves British boxing.
MBE sounds like those guys trying to get a Retweet from Eddie. :lol1:
Did you buy Bellew-Clev 2 as well?