You had Garcia winning on the cards. Same type of fight, Paulie landed more jabs and body shots, Broner landed fewer harder shots
So let me get this straight. Garcia beat Herrera because Broner beat Paulie? When your best justification for someone winning a fight is bringing up a completely different fight, you know you've gone full retard.
You had Garcia winning on the cards. Same type of fight, Paulie landed more jabs and body shots, Broner landed fewer harder shots
No, no, no, no, no, no. NO!
For fks sakes, what's wrong with people here?:lol1:
Very stupid logic. Broner landed enough clean shots in enough rounds to clearly win a fight he struggled in. Garcia didn't.
They weren't the exact same fight, and pretending they are is stupid.
So now a bloody nose justifies who wins a fight? What are we in middle school? It was a close fight. You guys crying over a robbery. In some rounds Herrera landed jabs to the body here and there but Danny was landing some power shots. Paulie outworked Broner as Herrera did here but the fighter that landed the power shots won. I scored the fight round by round it was close but I scored it for Danny. Garcia is limited but there was no robbery.
LOL. No.
Broner landed cleaner, more effective punches. Garcia was missing and Herrera was more effective offensively than Paulie was. Garcia was damaged, bloodied and backpedaling. Broner was stalking and pressing the action.
No two fights are the same. People always do this **** to justify robberies.
What's next?
If you thought Canelo beat Trout then you though Danny won?
If you thought Donaire beat Mathebula then you thought Danny won?
If you thought Matthysse beat Judah then you thought Danny won?
I thought that Canelo-Trout fight was very close. I knew they would give it to Saul as the draw and the KD helped things.
I thought Mathebula beat Donaire
He outlanded him by a wide margin and made him miss a lot. Matthysse best Judah imo and Hererra beat Garcia
In all the fights, I feel they were close and were given to the bigger draw
Uhhhhh No.....
But.....I do think the fight was closer then people are making it out to be on here. I've seen a few ringside scores that had a draw like I did. I haven't re-watched the fight though.
You had Garcia winning on the cards. Same type of fight, Paulie landed more jabs and body shots, Broner landed fewer harder shots
You ****ing idiot. This place has lost the plot.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.....
Not even close to being the same type of fight. Herrera bloodied Danny, frustrated him all night long and didn't get hit with hardly ANY clean shots.
On the other hand, Paulie landed more, but never bloodied up Broner and was hit with many clean right hand counters. I had ZERO problems with Broner winning that fight, and it was very close.
This one wasn't as close as people are making it out to be.
not the same type of fight. broner was taking away a lot of paulie's punches to the head, and blocking a lot of what came to the body. paulie also had to show his terrific chin against broner, who did land some counters.
herrera was landing a lot of gas on danny's face, and danny wasn't landing flush in return.
LOL. No.
Broner landed cleaner, more effective punches. Garcia was missing and Herrera was more effective offensively than Paulie was. Garcia was damaged, bloodied and backpedaling. Broner was stalking and pressing the action.
No two fights are the same. People always do this **** to justify robberies.
What's next?
If you thought Canelo beat Trout then you though Danny won?
If you thought Donaire beat Mathebula then you thought Danny won?
If you thought Matthysse beat Judah then you thought Danny won?
12y ago
If you had Broner winning vs Paulie... | BoxingScene Community