Something's wrong here, why werent there this many people standing up for Clottey?

I have confirmed what a few posters are saying. That Paulie Malignaggi's rants on how he was going to get robbed and how the whole world was against him played a psychological role in the minds of all of you. There is a mad outcry going around not only on the judges score cards, but on how Diaz definitely, positively lost that fight. This is a fight that was supposed to be able to go either way, a close fight, but people are saying it was a robbery. The only thing that was a robbery were the judges score cards of 118-110 and maybe 116-112. But the fight itself? I dont know how you can argue that it was a closely contested bout. This fight reminds me of the Cotto-Clottey fight. And there was not this much fuss about this fight, not this many people saying Cotto definitely lost, not this much outcry for an investigation, there are people asking if Paulie can file a lawsuit. Should Clottey have taken the Malignaggi route and speak loudly and openly enough to reach ears and hearts of people all over the world? Why not this much backing up of Clottey? He should learn from Malignaggi and throw a fit before and after his next fight because if it ends up being a close fight and he is on the losing end, at least he will have the people on his side. Cotto vs Clottey punch stats: Cotto- landed 179 of 723(25%) Clottey- landed 222 of 622 (36%) Clottey outlands Cotto by 43 punches. Diaz vs Malignaggi punch stats: Malignaggi- landed 191 of 949 Diaz- landed 178 of 663 Malignaggi outlands Diaz by 13 punches(if you want to call them that); And one more thing, Cotto had a tougher time than Diaz did.