I posted a link showing that nearly 700 counties that voted for Obama in '12 flipped for Trump in '16.
His answer?
"Rayciss".
So unless he can prove that every single voter from those counties that flipped is indeed racist, he's point holds no merit.
But he can't, and he won't concede, so it makes him a stubborn vagina.
Glad I could clear that up.
Go back and read my post. I didn't say everybody that voted for Trump was a racist. I said all of the racist in this country voted for Trump.I will always believe that.
Go back and read my post. I didn't say everybody that voted for Trump was a racist. I said all of the racist in this country voted for Trump.I will always believe that.
Go back and read my post. I didn't say everybody that voted for Trump was a racist. I said all of the racist in this country voted for Trump.I will always believe that.
You can believe what ever you want. The idea that there is a cut and dry quintessential example that represents a segment of our country that should be defined as "white racist" or "racist" because there is cultural/tribal tensions between others is ridiculous. Hate to break it to you but racism exists in all forms and everybody has racist tendencies toward those that are different. It's a toxic platform to be pushing forward by the Democrats branding those they disagree with as "racist" and shutting down any discussion. It's pretty clear the Clinton coalition has learned nothing in defeat and ironically are the close minded ignoramuses who can't get a clue. So bottom line it's a childish argument. Racist or race supremacist or whatever you want to call them voted on both sides of the election. I mean as far as racism goes Al Sharpton is a racist, No? This sort of blame game is going to drag the political discussion into the gutter and offer nothing but destruction
Comment