Is Maskaev the softest title holder of all time?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #31
    Originally posted by Kid Achilles
    Briggs is relative to the conversation because he, and not Maskaev, is the worst title holder in heavyweight history. Maskaev is one of the worst, but compared to Briggs he looks pretty damn good. There is your relevance. Conversation over.
    Whatever helps you sleep better.

    Maskaev is garbage, that upsets you, you look to displace.

    Classic, and sad. As usual, you just make yourslef look pathetic.

    Comment

    • DiegoFuego
      Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2005
      • 17338
      • 1,403
      • 586
      • 24,657

      #32
      Maskaev and Briggs both suck, but good for them for taking advantage against passive champions in Rahman and Liakhovich. if ever there was a division you could not be passive in, THIS IS IT. I mean this division SUCKS. worst division ever. it's like whoever gets out of bed and decides to go balls to the wall will be the man that night.

      Comment

      • paul750
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2005
        • 7636
        • 334
        • 237
        • 16,264

        #33
        Both men have lost to fringe contenders. Maskaev has had bad losses, as has Briggs. To say otherwise would be silly.

        Comment

        • Kid Achilles
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2004
          • 6376
          • 467
          • 354
          • 14,544

          #34
          I'd like to hear it from you that Briggs is ****. I admitted Maskaev is one of the worst title holders, which is as plain as day and never did I defend him as a good champion or even having a possibility of unifying the titles. The only time Maskaev looks good is in comparison to a joke like Seldon or Briggs (I actually consider Seldon higher than Brigg because at least he possessed talent to balance out his lack of jaw and heart). Now let's hear you admit how ****ty Briggs is.

          Comment

          • Bozo_no no
            Palabras de Piedra
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 8906
            • 416
            • 496
            • 16,069

            #35
            Originally posted by Kid Achilles
            I'd like to hear it from you that Briggs is ****. I admitted Maskaev is one of the worst title holders, which is as plain as day and never did I defend him as a good champion or even having a possibility of unifying the titles. The only time Maskaev looks good is in comparison to a joke like Seldon or Briggs (I actually consider Seldon higher than Brigg because at least he possessed talent to balance out his lack of jaw and heart). Now let's hear you admit how ****ty Briggs is.
            You're only (laughably) implying I'm a big Briggs fan or supporter to make yourself feel better about getting called on sticking up for Maskaev.

            Briggs is garbage, but so is Maskaev, and that's what this thread is about.

            Maskaev has been knocked out more often, and in highlight reel KO's by garbage fighters. So has Briggs, but not as often, and not in as hilarious a fashion (a Jab from Whittaker for example).

            He sucks, and you came in here to stick up for him. Bottom line.

            Comment

            • Kid Achilles
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2004
              • 6376
              • 467
              • 354
              • 14,544

              #36
              Yes I am defending him. Whoever started this thread claimed that Maskaev is the worst title holder of all time which is BS. He may suck, but he is clearly superior to Briggs or Seldon. Maskaev would destroy Briggs, it would not go the full 12. I hope the two have the opportunity to fight and you will all realize just how true this is.

              Comment

              • Bozo_no no
                Palabras de Piedra
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2005
                • 8906
                • 416
                • 496
                • 16,069

                #37
                Originally posted by Kid Achilles
                Yes I am defending him.
                LMAO

                He may suck, but he is clearly superior to Briggs or Seldon.

                clearly
                adv

                Definition: without any doubt
                Antonyms: indefinitely, indistinctly, mysteriously, vaguely




                Maskaev would destroy Briggs, it would not go the full 12.
                Please!

                Oleg would take one flush Goofi shot before he got Kirk Johnson'd out of the ring into a T-Rex puddle.

                Comment

                • GunStar
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 10656
                  • 774
                  • 2,464
                  • 12,344

                  #38
                  Maskaev does have the power to knock Wlad out! Maskaev have the real belt from Rahman.

                  ****** thread!

                  Comment

                  • Joeyzagz
                    Soir
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 6253
                    • 569
                    • 567
                    • 16,120

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Kid Achilles
                    I'd like to hear it from you that Briggs is ****. I admitted Maskaev is one of the worst title holders, which is as plain as day and never did I defend him as a good champion or even having a possibility of unifying the titles. The only time Maskaev looks good is in comparison to a joke like Seldon or Briggs (I actually consider Seldon higher than Brigg because at least he possessed talent to balance out his lack of jaw and heart). Now let's hear you admit how ****ty Briggs is.
                    Briggs actually has aspirations of unifying titles!

                    Maskaev on the other hand, is a droopy testicle who is scared of all the other Eastern European contenders and anyone with less than 4 losses. Peter Ohkolo? Okholo isnt even ranked in the top 20!! How is this fight allowed to happen?

                    I hope his ugly wife goes to hell.

                    Comment

                    • paul750
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 7636
                      • 334
                      • 237
                      • 16,264

                      #40
                      Picking Okhello is insane, Barrett is one thing, but this is getting beyond a joke with the heavyweights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP