Is Maskaev the softest title holder of all time?
Collapse
-
-
Maskaev and Briggs both suck, but good for them for taking advantage against passive champions in Rahman and Liakhovich. if ever there was a division you could not be passive in, THIS IS IT. I mean this division SUCKS. worst division ever. it's like whoever gets out of bed and decides to go balls to the wall will be the man that night.Comment
-
I'd like to hear it from you that Briggs is ****. I admitted Maskaev is one of the worst title holders, which is as plain as day and never did I defend him as a good champion or even having a possibility of unifying the titles. The only time Maskaev looks good is in comparison to a joke like Seldon or Briggs (I actually consider Seldon higher than Brigg because at least he possessed talent to balance out his lack of jaw and heart). Now let's hear you admit how ****ty Briggs is.Comment
-
You're only (laughably) implying I'm a big Briggs fan or supporter to make yourself feel better about getting called on sticking up for Maskaev.I'd like to hear it from you that Briggs is ****. I admitted Maskaev is one of the worst title holders, which is as plain as day and never did I defend him as a good champion or even having a possibility of unifying the titles. The only time Maskaev looks good is in comparison to a joke like Seldon or Briggs (I actually consider Seldon higher than Brigg because at least he possessed talent to balance out his lack of jaw and heart). Now let's hear you admit how ****ty Briggs is.
Briggs is garbage, but so is Maskaev, and that's what this thread is about.
Maskaev has been knocked out more often, and in highlight reel KO's by garbage fighters. So has Briggs, but not as often, and not in as hilarious a fashion (a Jab from Whittaker for example).
He sucks, and you came in here to stick up for him. Bottom line.Comment
-
Yes I am defending him. Whoever started this thread claimed that Maskaev is the worst title holder of all time which is BS. He may suck, but he is clearly superior to Briggs or Seldon. Maskaev would destroy Briggs, it would not go the full 12. I hope the two have the opportunity to fight and you will all realize just how true this is.Comment
-
LMAO
He may suck, but he is clearly superior to Briggs or Seldon.
clearly
adv
Definition: without any doubt
Antonyms: indefinitely, indistinctly, mysteriously, vaguely

Please!Maskaev would destroy Briggs, it would not go the full 12.
Oleg would take one flush Goofi shot before he got Kirk Johnson'd out of the ring into a T-Rex puddle.Comment
-
Briggs actually has aspirations of unifying titles!I'd like to hear it from you that Briggs is ****. I admitted Maskaev is one of the worst title holders, which is as plain as day and never did I defend him as a good champion or even having a possibility of unifying the titles. The only time Maskaev looks good is in comparison to a joke like Seldon or Briggs (I actually consider Seldon higher than Brigg because at least he possessed talent to balance out his lack of jaw and heart). Now let's hear you admit how ****ty Briggs is.
Maskaev on the other hand, is a droopy testicle who is scared of all the other Eastern European contenders and anyone with less than 4 losses. Peter Ohkolo? Okholo isnt even ranked in the top 20!! How is this fight allowed to happen?
I hope his ugly wife goes to hell.Comment
Comment