Is Maskaev the softest title holder of all time?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Oh, how predictable, Bozo has come to defend one of his pet New York fighters. We're splitting hairs here buddy, and yes Sedreck Fields is worse than any of the guys you just mentioned.
Also Maskaev might not have much of a chin but the guy at least has some stamina and heart: qualities that Briggs doesn't know much about.Comment
-
I remember as a kid thinking he was good on ESPN because of his body. Bowe took him out in one round and I quickly changed my mind. Great minds think alike.Comment
-
Pet New Yourk fighters?Oh, how predictable, Bozo has come to defend one of his pet New York fighters. We're splitting hairs here buddy, and yes Sedreck Fields is worse than any of the guys you just mentioned.
Also Maskaev might not have much of a chin but the guy at least has some stamina and heart: qualities that Briggs doesn't know much about.
Wow are you a ****ing goof. Get called out on your garbage, have nothing to say, so make something up.
Maskaev is garbage, and he's been shattered by garbage.
Accept it and move on.Comment
-
Briggs is worthless as a champion, and will lose his belt the minute he defends it against a top caliber opponent. Live with it.Comment
-
That wasnt' the topic, but the fact you're ranting about it in this thread just illustrates how crinkled up your little panties are getting at the talk of Maskaev being (rightfully) called ****.
Ranting about Briggs doesn't make Oleg any less of a walking piece of garbage glass.Comment
-
-
Briggs is relative to the conversation because he, and not Maskaev, is the worst title holder in heavyweight history. Maskaev is one of the worst, but compared to Briggs he looks pretty damn good. There is your relevance. Conversation over.Comment
Comment