Is Maskaev the softest title holder of all time?

**El Jesus** · 11-13-2006, 06:50 PM

..no, he tried his hardest to come back and try to win one when everyoen wrote him off, hes not that talented at this point, but soft? no.

**FibreOptic** · 11-13-2006, 07:00 PM

I say he beats Briggs.

**Joeyzagz** · 11-13-2006, 07:13 PM

Who the hell is Peter Ohkolo??? There are at least a half dozen Heavyweights out there who actually have NAMES but Maskaev wants to be a *****cat and fight people we never heard of.

He lost to Sanders, Tua, kirk Johnson, whititaker, and his greatest victory is over a scrub like Rahman.

I believe Briggs would KO him in 7

Peter KO's him in 3

Klitschko could do it in 2

**Kid Achilles** · 11-13-2006, 07:19 PM

No, Briggs is. At least Maskaev knows how to throw an awesome straight right. Briggs often throws arm punches and wide hooks. Maskaev is a better boxer and fighter. Both are lacking in the chin department but Maskaev has better stamina by far.

**Joeyzagz** · 11-13-2006, 07:28 PM

Oleg is an older, slower, more wrinkled version of Serg.

Briggs would castrate him for breakfast.

**K-DOGG** · 11-13-2006, 07:32 PM

Originally posted by Soir

I will answer for you...Maskaev is a talentless piece of duck**** vomit.

Klitschko, Toney, Peter, Valuev, Brock and even Briggs would all beat the hell out of that dirty old midget.

Stop putting him in your top 5, he sucks ass.

Lost money on the Rahman fight did we?

**scap** · 11-13-2006, 07:34 PM

Lets not forget Bruce Seldon.

**BmoreBrawler** · 11-13-2006, 07:35 PM

At least he won a title in an exciting fight instead of a physical mismatch like 2 of the Soviet Bloc guys.

**Derranged** · 11-13-2006, 08:45 PM

I dont know about SOFT, but I agree that he isnt all that good. He just seems to have Rahman's number. Wladimir would mop the floor with him, Briggs would brutally KO him and Valuev would stop him late.

Is Maskaev the softest title holder of all time?