guzman will lose to pac..he has a win and all them guys are saying that he is the best at 130 thats too much nuthugging! cmon
PACQUIAO vs. GUZMAN
Collapse
-
no way. just because he looked good in one fight? he looks good in most of his fights. its no fluke that he looked good against barrios. he has over 300 amateur fights. who else can u say that about? imo guzman is ready for anyone. he just needs one of these guys to give him a chance.Originally posted by UndefeatedYea man.. Just because Guzman looked good for one fight they think that they could put him in the ring with Manny. IMO Guzman is not ready for him. Let him fight a lil more.. But he is still going to lose. Manny is to fast.
just so u know.. he's already beaten Terdsak Jandaeng. the same guy who gave jmm a very competitive fight. very tough.Last edited by SalvaDominicano; 09-19-2006, 01:24 AM.Comment
-
Originally posted by kg21mvpguzman will lose to pac..he has a win and all them guys are saying that he is the best at 130 thats too much nuthugging! cmon
its not nuthugging. everyone b4 the fight except for a few said that barrios would destroy him and that he was too big and strong. where are those people now? oo yea they are hating.Comment
-
-
wow... i dont even know what to say.Originally posted by kg21mvpthe barrios fight.. he was outboxed and the judges saw the punhces of guzman better than the accumulative punches thrown by barrios..Comment
-
It's not even worth talking about. You are so biased to see Barrios winning! Please re-watch the fight and tell me which rds u think he won and then ill re-watch and see what u r talking about cuz right now I think u are messed up in the head.Originally posted by kg21mvpwhy is that?Comment
-
Velasquez was a pretty big foe for a "tune-up" fight.The fight only look like a one sided affair because Pac was so good, after the fight it was considered a "tune -up" fight but before it was held not a few people predicted an upset because of the size disparity.In fact, a lot of people believed back then that a Velasquez upset was more probable than a Raheem upset.In reality, it was a testing ground for PaC wheter he could really hang in with the big boys of 130 lbs.Originally posted by Souza2012Velazquez wasnt suppose to annihilate Pac lol, the guy was his ***in warm up fight. Everyone knew Pc would win.
Morales vs Pac, Pac was favored to win the first fight. The majority bet was Pac by KO, and the same with the second fight.
Pac vs JMM was even, because most people werent sure about Pac yet.
and I dont know about the other fights you were talking about but them guys are all bums so I dont see how they were favored over Pac, and with the info you gave on these other fights, they probably werent favored just liek the other guys you mentioned. Sorry that just didnt make sense.
The Morales 2nd fight, I agree Pac was favored, albeit, slightly to win, BUT BUT guess what, it was because MORALES came of a loss and a terrible loss at that to Raheem. It like a Morales lose is much more probable than a PAC win.
THis is non-sense my friend >>>>"and I dont know about the other fights you were talking about but them guys are all bums so I dont see how they were favored over Pac," because you haven't seen relatively alot of fights by PAC and your so called " BUM opponents" and now your very sure that Guzman will make a mince meat of Pac's punches.Comment
Comment