u mean how he was gettin his ass kicked and fought threw exhaustion and didnt give up until he was k.oed?
No I mean the bully got bullied and didn't know what to do, I'm a Tyson fan, but I always said if he had the balls and the chin of Hagler he would've been undefeated and the greatest heavyweight of all time.
No I mean the bully got bullied and didn't know what to do, I'm a Tyson fan, but I always said if he had the balls and the chin of Hagler he would've been undefeated and the greatest heavyweight of all time.
oh ok.but he did have a good chin.taking shots the way he does with out flinching.it has to be many shots for him to go down. but yeah i get what your saying
Hagler hit harder and was physically stronger then Lamotta. Get real!
Hagler hit harder than Lamotta but Jake was physically stronger. He outmuscled light heavies and heavies during his career. There is a difference between punch power and physical strength.
Hagler hit harder than Lamotta but Jake was physically stronger. He outmuscled light heavies and heavies during his career. There is a difference between punch power and physical strength.
You don't even know how physically strong Hagler was, he may not been the hardest puncher in the middleweight history, but he def was physically the strongest middleweight of all time.
Comment