Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Could ray Robinson KO Hagler?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by TonyRingside
    what do you mean less than excellant middleweight division? leonard,hearns,& duran. yeah they're definately less than excellent fighters.
    Leonard & Hearns were welterweights who moved up; Duran was a Lightweight.


    Name someone else.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by K-DOGG
      Leonard & Hearns were welterweights who moved up; Duran was a Lightweight.


      Name someone else.
      Robinson himself was a Welterweight, so please don't even fo there.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Gunstar1
        Hands down the greatest middleweight of all time, during the best era of boxing history.

        If Tyson would've had Haglers balls and chin, Tyson would've been the greatest heavyweight of all time.

        explain how tyson didnt have balls besides holyfield 2.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by versatile2k6
          explain how tyson didnt have balls besides holyfield 2.
          Douglas was the first fight, I found out about Tyson balls.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Gunstar1
            Douglas was the first fight, I found out about Tyson balls.
            u mean how he was gettin his ass kicked and fought threw exhaustion and didnt give up until he was k.oed?

            im getting tired of ppl sayin tyson didnt have no heart and so on.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by versatile2k6
              u mean how he was gettin his ass kicked and fought threw exhaustion and didnt give up until he was k.oed?
              No I mean the bully got bullied and didn't know what to do, I'm a Tyson fan, but I always said if he had the balls and the chin of Hagler he would've been undefeated and the greatest heavyweight of all time.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Gunstar1
                No I mean the bully got bullied and didn't know what to do, I'm a Tyson fan, but I always said if he had the balls and the chin of Hagler he would've been undefeated and the greatest heavyweight of all time.
                oh ok.but he did have a good chin.taking shots the way he does with out flinching.it has to be many shots for him to go down. but yeah i get what your saying

                Comment


                • #78
                  Hagler hit harder and was physically stronger then Lamotta. Get real!
                  Hagler hit harder than Lamotta but Jake was physically stronger. He outmuscled light heavies and heavies during his career. There is a difference between punch power and physical strength.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by versatile2k6
                    u mean how he was gettin his ass kicked and fought threw exhaustion and didnt give up until he was k.oed?

                    im getting tired of ppl sayin tyson didnt have no heart and so on.

                    Id say Holyfield 2 was Tysons chance to prove himself, and he chose to piss it away.

                    I dont think that Tyson didnt have BAAAALLLLS, but he lacked the mental toughness that made Hagler such a great champion.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
                      Hagler hit harder than Lamotta but Jake was physically stronger. He outmuscled light heavies and heavies during his career. There is a difference between punch power and physical strength.
                      You don't even know how physically strong Hagler was, he may not been the hardest puncher in the middleweight history, but he def was physically the strongest middleweight of all time.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP