Hamed vs Morales

[daggerdeux]

If Tito fights DLH at 160lbs he will be KTFO! And retire for another two yrs. Man that kid is so weak minded

I do not think de La hoya has enough power to knock Tito on that weight but I beleive Dela Hoya will win UD>

[eazy_mas]

Tarver would have had nothing special to bring if the two met at their peaks. And no Tarver ain't great and he aint a hall of famer.

I agree with you i seen Tarver-Jones 3 it looks he is just waiting to couterpunch.

that style is no good and made Tarver look bad.

[daggerdeux]

Tarver would have had nothing special to bring if the two met at their peaks. And no Tarver ain't great and he aint a hall of famer.

Barry McGuigan made the HOF by beating Pedroza. And I thought that was shot Pedroza.

[Madcow]

Naz

Naz's downfall was when he made an effort to become more orthodox. The crazy, dancing Prince was great and might've done better against the tough and proficient, but uncreative Barrera.

I think, though, Morales would've done good against Naz too. Morales was more of a boxer.

[daggerdeux]

Naz's downfall was when he made an effort to become more orthodox. The crazy, dancing Prince was great and might've done better against the tough and proficient, but uncreative Barrera.

I think, though, Morales would've done good against Naz too. Morales was more of a boxer.

Hamed will not stop and certaily not out box the slicker Morales. SO Morales will win UD.

[eazy_mas]

Naz's downfall was when he made an effort to become more orthodox. The crazy, dancing Prince was great and might've done better against the tough and proficient, but uncreative Barrera.

I think, though, Morales would've done good against Naz too. Morales was more of a boxer.

I agree with you 100%

That is his style for many years and you cant change him.

sometimes some people thing he is dancing is part of showing off but it also confuses many boxers.

[Madcow]

Hamed will not stop and certaily not out box the slicker Morales. SO Morales will win UD.

That's what I said.

[The Noose]

[B]Naseem Hamed was a better, and a more focused fighter in 95. He deteriorated as a fighter leading up to the Barrera fight, especially post Brendan Ingle. Hamed claimed that when he seperated from Brendan Ingle he would bring in a trainer that would help his progress as a fighter, and when Steward was mentioned i thought that this would be the case, however, as already mentioned, Saurez was added to the mix and Hamed didn't progress at all IMO, which is a great shame because he was possibly the most talented fighter in British history.

I know all that. But wat i was asking is as far as Hamed's performance aginst Barrera goes. Compared to Hamed at his best. What would he of done differently?

I havent studied his technique, his fights and his career so i dont know.

Many will argue he got hit more because the quality of opposition grew higher.
That seems to be true.

[miron_lang]

Possibly...I think the only two guys in the world during that time that would have a chance at beating Naz would have been Barrera and Morales. It would have been a beautiful fight to watch tho.

Juan Manuel Marquez