But I think that Peter has good potential - if he slims down and stops rabbit punching (and the refs need to call him out on that!) and if he develops a killer instinct.
It was done in the thread I just linked. I don't want to start all over again, on and on and on. I'm not even that interested in this fight. I don't think that either one of them is very good.
WW
No that's alright you don't have too, but like I said before you did prove my point
"but to say that this poll isn't valid is bull****"
What are you, f'ing ******!? Look at the way this idiot poll is worded - like a f'ing parody!
WW
Not a ****** as you, It's doesn't matter how the poll is worded(unless you're ****in' ******ed) if you thought Peters won then that's how you vote, regardless of how it's worded.
Sorry that I'm a James Toney fan, but I'm a boxing fan first & foremost, & I watch a fight not a fighter. If I had seen Toney get his ass whopped then I'd be right there saying that Toney deserved the loss, what I saw was Toney schooling Peters & Peters getting off a few nice shots, but not enough to have won the fight, sorry but I call'em like I see'em.
Everyone obsessing over the numbers in this poll are failing to realize that they are skewed dramatically by the wording. "No, I'm an idiot, I.." ---? Who is going to click on that? And where is the choice for draw?
Gunstar in his infinite wisdom posts a poll where anyone disagreeing with him will see two wrong choices. I had Toney winning by a point, but I didn't vote because it's a ****** poll, so PLEASE don't worry over these poll numbers.
As for Press Row scoring, that is notorious for being incorrect, so that can normally always be thrown out. If you've ever sat ringside for a fight, then you know that it's not the best seat for seeing the action. Actually being a little farther back and HIGHER up is much, much better (like dead center court, a few rows up), similar to a perspective you get watching the broadcast. Judges, being on the ring apron, have the best of all the ringside seats of course, but especially in heavyweight fights where there are only two to three key sequences per round, especially late in the fight, which determine the scoring of that round- yet if one fighter has his back to the judge, then he almost totally blocks the judge from seeing that action, even if it's only for a few seconds, sometimes that's enough to miss the key sequence that should have determined who won a close round. Judges need an inclined area to view the fights from that is still very close to the action. That won't stop the corrupt judging, but it will help the honest cards to be a lot more accurate. It will never happen, though, as boxing is just too stuck in tradition for anything that radical.
As usual, you're bitching and blowing smoke all the while sitting on the fence offering no opinion of how you saw it.
All you do is come to this site to complain.
95% of it's about Mayweather, and now here you are complaining about this without offering your own take.
Considering the source, no one needs you to explain anything.
OMG, do you have nothing better to do than follow me around and obsess over me?
If you'll read the post, I just said "I had Toney winning by a point." I've posted before how I saw the fight, why should I have to cut and paste my entire opinion every time I comment about the fight? LOL Grow a brain.
Once again, your hate for me shines through. I've made you look like a fool so much in the past that you have to chase me down and make any post I make in any thread about me and you. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.
Comment