I honestly don't think Peters won more the 4 or 5 rounds, so I don't see how he won, but I'm gonna rewatch the fight & score it round by round to see what I come up with. Sure it was a good fight, but not close enough for him to have lost a decision IMHO.
Toney/Peter WHO WON THE FIGHT???
Collapse
-
-
peter landed 3 square shots and about 50 toney rolled with... toney hit hit square all night with the jab alone ...Comment
-
Originally posted by realheavyhandspeter landed 3 square shots and about 50 toney rolled with... toney hit hit square all night with the jab alone ...Comment
-
Originally posted by restless_438121 vs. 22... yup, and all 121 are "nuthuggers"Comment
-
Originally posted by beez721the problem is a good many of the nuthuggers obviously made multiple screen names to skew the votes. its obvious which ones would do that considering all the childish crying that went on after the decision was announcedComment
-
Originally posted by Left2bodyI think there is too much talk of Toney being hurt. Much of it was Toney's balance and I believe tactics. Look at Toney's reaction when he misses a punch the way he staggers back into the ropes, or when Peter sometimes lands a glancing blow on TOney's sholder or body Toney would also stagger into the ropes.
I believe Toney was only stunned in 2 rounds.Comment
-
"Toney Won the fight
No I'm an idiot, I thought Peter won"
_____________
This is just like one of the whore media's bull**** polls!
And Peter won the f'ing fight! - one of the few times in the last 100 years that judges have scored a fight correctly. Guess you dimwits are so shocked by that incredibly rare event that it has driven you into hysterics.
WWComment
-
Originally posted by werewolf"Toney Won the fight
No I'm an idiot, I thought Peter won"
_____________
This is just like one of the whore media's bull**** polls!
And Peter won the f'ing fight! - one of the few times in the last 100 years that judges have scored a fight correctly. Guess you dimwits are so shocked by that incredibly rare event that it has driven you into hysterics.
WWComment
-
Refer to my thread on the subject, please. Peters was the aggressor throughout and landed the more effective blows. This has really gone on way too long. In the pantheon of crooked and idiotic boxing decisions over the past century, this fight doesn't even enter the picture, and it was actually the ccorrect decision.
WWLast edited by werewolf; 09-06-2006, 10:38 PM.Comment
-
Originally posted by werewolfRefer to my thread on the subject, please. Peters was the aggressor throughout and landed the more effective blows. This has really gone on way too long. In the pantheon of crooked and diotic boxing decisions over the past century, this fight doesn't even enter the picture, and it was actually the ccorrect decision.
WWComment
Comment